Anonymous wrote:You know how when you rent an apartment, you can’t do things to it as if you owned it? Well, under zoning, you are limited to what you can do in your own property. With Thrive, you’ll be able to build duplexes etc on your own property and your neighbors won’t be able to stop you. A win for individual property rights
Anonymous wrote:We've been looking in close in CC and Bethesda for over a year, and finally see some options we like with the spring selling season loosening inventory up. We are interested in Sfh neighborhood with density at the edges, and not a lot of hassle. That's just where we are in life. I would love a non hyperbolic (though I too am feeling caught by surprise and emotional) take on what the real impact of thrive 2050 is on real estate - both the current lifestyle and house values in offer in close in MoCo? Also, is it a done deal, or will it be finessed or fought? Thank you so much, and apologies for asking you to do my homework. I just hadn't really heard of it until it popped up in the metropolitan politics forum yesterday.
Anonymous wrote:You know how when you rent an apartment, you can’t do things to it as if you owned it? Well, under zoning, you are limited to what you can do in your own property. With Thrive, you’ll be able to build duplexes etc on your own property and your neighbors won’t be able to stop you. A win for individual property rights
Anonymous wrote:I wonder if moco is going to lie to the 20-something non profit workers like Arlington did. My guess is yes.
Anonymous wrote:It means homes in Potomac and Trivalah on two acres will be worth a fortune in 2050. Bethesda and Rockville will be epic slums.
Look at history of Coop City in Bronx. Same concept used in 1970s