Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know what Coros is. But I have a Garmin and I love it. I have the Forerunner - anything past 265 is excessive. They just came out with a new one - 165. It's fun and has some good insight. I've been doing the Daily Suggested Workout and find them helpful.
165 would probably work OK for OP.
But they all have their quirks, including screen quality. That’s why I suggested watching the reviews. There is a reason he makes an entire living doing those reviews.
Past 165 or 265 would be “excessive” for OP, maybe. But not generally. I wouldn’t do a full distance iron man with a 165. Maybe a 265, but probably not. It all depends on the use case.
So, yeah, watch the reviews.
Op here thx I think the 265 tracks strength training but the 165 does not. Strength tracking is a requirement for me.
Strength training tracking isn't super useful. It's too much of a pain in the ass to use.
I track strength on my Fitbit, not willing to give that up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know what Coros is. But I have a Garmin and I love it. I have the Forerunner - anything past 265 is excessive. They just came out with a new one - 165. It's fun and has some good insight. I've been doing the Daily Suggested Workout and find them helpful.
165 would probably work OK for OP.
But they all have their quirks, including screen quality. That’s why I suggested watching the reviews. There is a reason he makes an entire living doing those reviews.
Past 165 or 265 would be “excessive” for OP, maybe. But not generally. I wouldn’t do a full distance iron man with a 165. Maybe a 265, but probably not. It all depends on the use case.
So, yeah, watch the reviews.
Op here thx I think the 265 tracks strength training but the 165 does not. Strength tracking is a requirement for me.
Strength training tracking isn't super useful. It's too much of a pain in the ass to use.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know what Coros is. But I have a Garmin and I love it. I have the Forerunner - anything past 265 is excessive. They just came out with a new one - 165. It's fun and has some good insight. I've been doing the Daily Suggested Workout and find them helpful.
165 would probably work OK for OP.
But they all have their quirks, including screen quality. That’s why I suggested watching the reviews. There is a reason he makes an entire living doing those reviews.
Past 165 or 265 would be “excessive” for OP, maybe. But not generally. I wouldn’t do a full distance iron man with a 165. Maybe a 265, but probably not. It all depends on the use case.
So, yeah, watch the reviews.
Op here thx I think the 265 tracks strength training but the 165 does not. Strength tracking is a requirement for me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know what Coros is. But I have a Garmin and I love it. I have the Forerunner - anything past 265 is excessive. They just came out with a new one - 165. It's fun and has some good insight. I've been doing the Daily Suggested Workout and find them helpful.
165 would probably work OK for OP.
But they all have their quirks, including screen quality. That’s why I suggested watching the reviews. There is a reason he makes an entire living doing those reviews.
Past 165 or 265 would be “excessive” for OP, maybe. But not generally. I wouldn’t do a full distance iron man with a 165. Maybe a 265, but probably not. It all depends on the use case.
So, yeah, watch the reviews.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know what Coros is. But I have a Garmin and I love it. I have the Forerunner - anything past 265 is excessive. They just came out with a new one - 165. It's fun and has some good insight. I've been doing the Daily Suggested Workout and find them helpful.
165 would probably work OK for OP.
But they all have their quirks, including screen quality. That’s why I suggested watching the reviews. There is a reason he makes an entire living doing those reviews.
Past 165 or 265 would be “excessive” for OP, maybe. But not generally. I wouldn’t do a full distance iron man with a 165. Maybe a 265, but probably not. It all depends on the use case.
So, yeah, watch the reviews.
Anonymous wrote:I don't know what Coros is. But I have a Garmin and I love it. I have the Forerunner - anything past 265 is excessive. They just came out with a new one - 165. It's fun and has some good insight. I've been doing the Daily Suggested Workout and find them helpful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know what Coros is. But I have a Garmin and I love it. I have the Forerunner - anything past 265 is excessive. They just came out with a new one - 165. It's fun and has some good insight. I've been doing the Daily Suggested Workout and find them helpful.
OP here, thx how many miles a week do you run?
Anonymous wrote:I don't know what Coros is. But I have a Garmin and I love it. I have the Forerunner - anything past 265 is excessive. They just came out with a new one - 165. It's fun and has some good insight. I've been doing the Daily Suggested Workout and find them helpful.
Anonymous wrote:Go watch some dc rainmaker reviews and you’ll have your answer.