Anonymous wrote:I think it depends on what you are looking for and where you want to go after college.
I went to a regional college -- Cal Poly SLO -- but it's the top ranked "regional" college in the West, has a very strong reputation in California. I had a great experience there and got strong practical experience that directly led to my first job. However, in retrospect, I knew in the longer term I wanted to move to the East coast (most of our relatives are here, applied to Eastern colleges that my parents decided were too expensive) so it might have been better for me to choose a school with greater name recognition. I know CPSLO is better known now but wasn't back then.
OTOH, my reasons for choosing CPSLO over better-known UCs made sense -- I wanted a smaller, more undergrad focused experience. I liked the "learn by doing" approach which gave me the experience that helped start my career. I was a really timid 17 yr old going off to college and still think I'd likely have floundered at the huge U.
In the end I got the job I wanted out of school (in LA) and through that built contacts that helped me make the jump East and ultimately went to grad school here.
One of my kids goes to a regional college, in the mid-Atlantic, basically for the same reasons I did and I think it's a good fit. She also feels strongly that she wants to stay in the region so a regional school is just fine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:After that post bashing the PA one, is it how people feel, that regional colleges are bad and sort of loser-ish?
Of course they're not all looked at that way. But East Stroudsberg is not a good school at all. I'd be willing to bet it also has major financial problems. Many regionals do.
Stop saying "willing to bet" if you don't know . . . either cite the fact you're speculating about or zip it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:After that post bashing the PA one, is it how people feel, that regional colleges are bad and sort of loser-ish?
Of course they're not all looked at that way. But East Stroudsberg is not a good school at all. I'd be willing to bet it also has major financial problems. Many regionals do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really think it depends on what you're looking for. I went to the main campus of a university with a robust regional system. In my area of the country, the regionals weren't looked well upon. In DC or New England or even CA, the difference wouldn't be as stark.
What if your flagship isn't an option? Do you do a lesser flagship in a different state just because it's still better ranked? It was very discouraging to read this post.
Tough question. I think I would personally would.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really think it depends on what you're looking for. I went to the main campus of a university with a robust regional system. In my area of the country, the regionals weren't looked well upon. In DC or New England or even CA, the difference wouldn't be as stark.
What if your flagship isn't an option? Do you do a lesser flagship in a different state just because it's still better ranked? It was very discouraging to read this post.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really think it depends on what you're looking for. I went to the main campus of a university with a robust regional system. In my area of the country, the regionals weren't looked well upon. In DC or New England or even CA, the difference wouldn't be as stark.
What if your flagship isn't an option? Do you do a lesser flagship in a different state just because it's still better ranked? It was very discouraging to read this post.
Anonymous wrote:I really think it depends on what you're looking for. I went to the main campus of a university with a robust regional system. In my area of the country, the regionals weren't looked well upon. In DC or New England or even CA, the difference wouldn't be as stark.
Anonymous wrote:After that post bashing the PA one, is it how people feel, that regional colleges are bad and sort of loser-ish?