Anonymous wrote:I think the key on back door roth ira is that you need to start when you are young, so that you haven't accumulated a traditional ira. That clearly doesn't work for older folks who were working before the advent of the roth ira, but it does work for people who are starting work now. I'm somewhere in between on the timescale and I had about $20K in a traditional IRA when I learned about the backdoor roth ira. I made a point to convert to a roth ira when I was in grad school and so had no meaningful income. The taxes, while small in retrospect, felt painful while a penniless grad school, but it's worked out nicely.
Anonymous wrote:I think the key on back door roth ira is that you need to start when you are young, so that you haven't accumulated a traditional ira. That clearly doesn't work for older folks who were working before the advent of the roth ira, but it does work for people who are starting work now. I'm somewhere in between on the timescale and I had about $20K in a traditional IRA when I learned about the backdoor roth ira. I made a point to convert to a roth ira when I was in grad school and so had no meaningful income. The taxes, while small in retrospect, felt painful while a penniless grad school, but it's worked out nicely.
Anonymous wrote:OP again. Ok I think I figured it out; thanks google. This isn't going to work for me because I have $600k in a traditional IRA.
Found this article:
https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/personal-finance/backdoor-roth-ira#:~:text=Cons%3A,tax%20bracket%20for%20the%20year.
It says:
How do you calculate your taxable percentage with the pro-rata rule?
- (non-deductible amount) / (total of all non-Roth IRA balances) = non-taxable percentage.
- (amount to be converted to Roth IRA) x (non-taxable percentage) = amount of after-tax funds converted to Roth IRA
In other words, "you don't get to cherry pick and only choose to convert your nondeductible contributions...because the IRS uses the IRA aggresgation rule when calculating taxes owed on a conversion, which means it views all your traditional IRAs as a single tax entity."
So let's say I make a $7,000 nondeductible IRA contribution this year and I immediately convert it to a Roth. My pre-tax traditional IRA is worth $600k, so with the nondeductible contribution it's worth $607k. The $7k is 1.1% of the total balance, meaning that 98.9% of my conversion is going to be taxable. Or $6,923. So I'm not causing myself to have to pay income tax on an extra $6,923 just so I can do a back door Roth. Makes no sense.
I knew it had to be too good to be true. So all these posters crowing about back door Roths and always making it seem like you're dumb if you don't do it either a) have no other traditional IRAs, b) don't know the rules or c) paying a whole lot of unnecessary taxes.
Anonymous wrote:OP. I'm high income ($1M) and I love Roths. I max out my Roth 401(k) every year and I don't care how valuable the deduction is for the traditional; I want as much of that magic Roth money as I can accumulate. So why am I not doing back door Roth? Sounds too good to be true. Why is there even an income limit to Roth IRA contributions if you can so easily get around it?
Isn't there some pro rate rule too - like if I have other big traditional IRAs, I have some tax consequence to conversion?
Anonymous wrote:OP. I'm high income ($1M) and I love Roths. I max out my Roth 401(k) every year and I don't care how valuable the deduction is for the traditional; I want as much of that magic Roth money as I can accumulate. So why am I not doing back door Roth? Sounds too good to be true. Why is there even an income limit to Roth IRA contributions if you can so easily get around it?
Isn't there some pro rate rule too - like if I have other big traditional IRAs, I have some tax consequence to conversion?
Anonymous wrote:+1 i was just thinking the other day that i need a step by step guide for this. I don’t understand- are you supposed to convert once a year? Once opportunistically?