Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't book short connections like that. I don't want to have to worry.
This.
My biggest travel pet peeve: the people who jump up as soon as we land and start loudly complaining they have a ridiculously short connection and are annoyed by everyone in the 35 rows ahead of them for not staying put so they can walk off first since they have 10 mins to catch their flight.
Take it up with the airlines who sell it this way. I don’t want to hang out at the airport for 3 hours so I don’t annoy you.
travel with me and it will not work out. I seem to be a magnate for plane delays.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't book short connections like that. I don't want to have to worry.
This.
My biggest travel pet peeve: the people who jump up as soon as we land and start loudly complaining they have a ridiculously short connection and are annoyed by everyone in the 35 rows ahead of them for not staying put so they can walk off first since they have 10 mins to catch their flight.
Take it up with the airlines who sell it this way. I don’t want to hang out at the airport for 3 hours so I don’t annoy you.
?
Because most people make connections through hubs with multiple options.
It’s just plain dumb to book a 45 min connection through a big airport and sit in the back of the plane and expect everyone to accommodate your poor planning.
It has always worked out, so not poor planning at all. Ideal in fact!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't book short connections like that. I don't want to have to worry.
This.
My biggest travel pet peeve: the people who jump up as soon as we land and start loudly complaining they have a ridiculously short connection and are annoyed by everyone in the 35 rows ahead of them for not staying put so they can walk off first since they have 10 mins to catch their flight.
Take it up with the airlines who sell it this way. I don’t want to hang out at the airport for 3 hours so I don’t annoy you.
?
Because most people make connections through hubs with multiple options.
It’s just plain dumb to book a 45 min connection through a big airport and sit in the back of the plane and expect everyone to accommodate your poor planning.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't book short connections like that. I don't want to have to worry.
This.
My biggest travel pet peeve: the people who jump up as soon as we land and start loudly complaining they have a ridiculously short connection and are annoyed by everyone in the 35 rows ahead of them for not staying put so they can walk off first since they have 10 mins to catch their flight.
Take it up with the airlines who sell it this way. I don’t want to hang out at the airport for 3 hours so I don’t annoy you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't book short connections like that. I don't want to have to worry.
This.
My biggest travel pet peeve: the people who jump up as soon as we land and start loudly complaining they have a ridiculously short connection and are annoyed by everyone in the 35 rows ahead of them for not staying put so they can walk off first since they have 10 mins to catch their flight.
Anonymous wrote:I don't book short connections like that. I don't want to have to worry.
Anonymous wrote:I’m looking at tickets for flights to Europe where the airline itself offers windows of just an hour (or even less time) to make the overseas flight.
What do I risk by accepting such an itinerary that doesn’t work out if my first flight is delayed or I simply can’t make it to the next flight in time?
I assume the airline would put me on another available flight; if it’s the next day, will they foot a hotel bill?
I’ve never purchased or needed travel insurance; would I need it in a case like this?