Anonymous wrote:If he means that cracking down, papering every arrest, and locking people up in large numbers will not decrease crime in DC, then he is clearly incorrect. If he means that the political will is lacking in DC to do any of those things, then he is correct.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes you can, look at El Salvador after their mass incarceration campaign to break the back of gangs. Their country has improved dramatically:
![]()
When you lockup criminals, crime goes down. Really common sense logic.
No due process and many innocent people swept up in and jailed. I don’t think this is the model we want to follow.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes you can, look at El Salvador after their mass incarceration campaign to break the back of gangs. Their country has improved dramatically:
![]()
When you lockup criminals, crime goes down. Really common sense logic.
No due process and many innocent people swept up in and jailed. I don’t think this is the model we want to follow.
Anonymous wrote:We need point-of-use gun control. People with illegal guns in DC must fear leaving their house with them knowing that getting caught means jail.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes you can, look at El Salvador after their mass incarceration campaign to break the back of gangs. Their country has improved dramatically:
![]()
When you lockup criminals, crime goes down. Really common sense logic.
No due process and many innocent people swept up in and jailed. I don’t think this is the model we want to follow.
Anonymous wrote:Yes you can, look at El Salvador after their mass incarceration campaign to break the back of gangs. Their country has improved dramatically:
![]()
When you lockup criminals, crime goes down. Really common sense logic.
Anonymous wrote:If he means that cracking down, papering every arrest, and locking people up in large numbers will not decrease crime in DC, then he is clearly incorrect. If he means that the political will is lacking in DC to do any of those things, then he is correct.
Anonymous wrote:DC’s attorney general, Brian Schwalb, recently made this statement in response to the DC carjacking / crime spike during a community forum.
Some on DCUM feel Council-member Charles Allen has been unfairly scape-goated over crime in DC, and they - rightly - bring up Brian Schwalb as someone who (if we are to blame city leaders) is just as much or more at fault. Setting aside Allen for the moment,
- Is our attorney general right? Is it impossible to deter or ameliorate crime by arresting and prosecuting criminals ? Agree or disagree?