Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm getting what OP is alluding to. In the last 5-10 years there's been a major shift to how historical productions are made. Accuracy isn't the focus. It's the Bridgertonization of history. In the first place, would they even make a movie about Adam, an old and stale white dude? A movie about Jefferson would end up 99% black and sharply critical of the founding fathers and the US constitution and declaration of Independence.
So, no, a movie about Adam wouldn't be the same any more. It'd probably morph into a movie about Abigail Adam, and they'd invent a radical black feminist lesbian best friend for her and imply a secret love affair between the two. Girl bosses are all the rage these days.
This is a little embarrassing to have to say, but, it’s Adams.
Shhh... don't interrupt the navel gazing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm getting what OP is alluding to. In the last 5-10 years there's been a major shift to how historical productions are made. Accuracy isn't the focus. It's the Bridgertonization of history. In the first place, would they even make a movie about Adam, an old and stale white dude? A movie about Jefferson would end up 99% black and sharply critical of the founding fathers and the US constitution and declaration of Independence.
So, no, a movie about Adam wouldn't be the same any more. It'd probably morph into a movie about Abigail Adam, and they'd invent a radical black feminist lesbian best friend for her and imply a secret love affair between the two. Girl bosses are all the rage these days.
This is a little embarrassing to have to say, but, it’s Adams.
Anonymous wrote:I'm getting what OP is alluding to. In the last 5-10 years there's been a major shift to how historical productions are made. Accuracy isn't the focus. It's the Bridgertonization of history. In the first place, would they even make a movie about Adam, an old and stale white dude? A movie about Jefferson would end up 99% black and sharply critical of the founding fathers and the US constitution and declaration of Independence.
So, no, a movie about Adam wouldn't be the same any more. It'd probably morph into a movie about Abigail Adam, and they'd invent a radical black feminist lesbian best friend for her and imply a secret love affair between the two. Girl bosses are all the rage these days.
Anonymous wrote:Adams didn’t have slaves. He defended slaves on the Anita’s. Yes, it would get made today.
Anonymous wrote:I am not trying to stir the pot.
No one in the was portrayed as gay. There were very little interactions between the African Americans and the white characters.
Would there be African American actors cast in the roles of the white characters?
I think it's a good question.
I don't think this series would be made today in the exact same way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous[b wrote:]Why wouldn’t it be produced today?[/b]
OP is trying to stir the pot. It wouldn't be handled differently today.
Anonymous[b wrote:]Why wouldn’t it be produced today?[/b]
Anonymous wrote:I binge watched the HBO series John Adams (2008).
How has this held up over time, 15 years later? Would HBO produce this today?
Would it be critically acclaimed today?
I enjoyed the immersive quality of the dialogue, costumes, setting, characters, actors.
When Jefferson died on July 4th, same day as Adams, he was surrounded by his crying African American slaves (or freed?). One was Sally.
The film didn't really spend much time on slavery.
In 2024, Would this be produced the same way?
Did the movie start a trend with the "Don't Tread on Me" flags popular today among the right?