Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At our large club (that generally has high performing teams), the best players played up at uLittle, but are all playing on-age group now.
There are still players playing up, but the club uses that to bolster weaker years, and they are not playing up the strongest players. So the best 2009 players still start for the 2009s, but if the 2008s need help at center back, the 4th best 2009 CB is playing up with the 2008s.
Seems to make sense and be a good outcome for good players that were born in strong birth years for the club.
Doesn't make sense to have a weak 2009 playing up with even weaker 2008's (since the development of the 09 should be the priority)
Anonymous wrote:At our large club (that generally has high performing teams), the best players played up at uLittle, but are all playing on-age group now.
There are still players playing up, but the club uses that to bolster weaker years, and they are not playing up the strongest players. So the best 2009 players still start for the 2009s, but if the 2008s need help at center back, the 4th best 2009 CB is playing up with the 2008s.
Seems to make sense and be a good outcome for good players that were born in strong birth years for the club.
Anonymous wrote:What does that have to do with culture of development?
DaniRojas wrote:Go ask the TDs and Age Group Directors.
Anonymous wrote:For folks who's kids are on teams U13 and older:
How many players on your child's (Division 1 or 2) team are playing up in age?