Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I could understand the motivation of those up for reelection, but this just seems like a mega-troll effort
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/manchin-co-sponsors-bill-to-codify-roe-v-wade/ar-BB1idvut?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=3a51cf86a57548e09f4201a6d5f9a84e&ei=48
"Sen. Joe Manchin (D) of West Virginia has co-sponsored what his office called in a press release a “bipartisan effort to codify Roe v. Wade.”
This comes after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health ruling in June of 2022, which effectively overturned Roe v. Wade"
What a ridiculous thought, OP! Just because a Senator is not running for office doesn't mean that he/she no longer has issues they care about. They aren't dead AND they are still in office and they should be speaking up about the travesty of the misogynistic Supreme Court and Trump's GOP.
Anonymous wrote:I could understand the motivation of those up for reelection, but this just seems like a mega-troll effort
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/manchin-co-sponsors-bill-to-codify-roe-v-wade/ar-BB1idvut?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=3a51cf86a57548e09f4201a6d5f9a84e&ei=48
"Sen. Joe Manchin (D) of West Virginia has co-sponsored what his office called in a press release a “bipartisan effort to codify Roe v. Wade.”
This comes after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health ruling in June of 2022, which effectively overturned Roe v. Wade"
Anonymous wrote:I could understand the motivation of those up for reelection, but this just seems like a mega-troll effort
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/manchin-co-sponsors-bill-to-codify-roe-v-wade/ar-BB1idvut?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=3a51cf86a57548e09f4201a6d5f9a84e&ei=48
"Sen. Joe Manchin (D) of West Virginia has co-sponsored what his office called in a press release a “bipartisan effort to codify Roe v. Wade.”
This comes after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health ruling in June of 2022, which effectively overturned Roe v. Wade"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is that trolling?!
because they voted against lifting the filibuster hold that would have codified it pre Dobbs. Now they will need 60 votes, and there just won't be anywhere close to that from the right.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is that trolling?!
because they voted against lifting the filibuster hold that would have codified it pre Dobbs. Now they will need 60 votes, and there just won't be anywhere close to that from the right.
Yes, but it forces all of the GOP Senators to be on the record that the voted against the bill. With elections in November, this is going to be a costly bill for the GOP to respond to. In every election since RvW was overturned, there has been record turnout and record voting against abortion restrictions. If GOP Senators have to go on record vetoing an abortion rights bill, you can bet that every one of them standing for reelection are going to have this become a major election issue for their opponents. And the record is not good for any candidate that rejects abortion rights. Even soundly right states like Kansas, Ohio, and Kentucky have voted for abortion rights and candidates that had to oppose abortion rights lost in those elections. Same in purple Virginia. In fact, the vote in Virginia essentially sunk Glenn Youngkin's explorations into a potential presidential run.
In general the American public is 58-62% behind abortion rights depending on how conservative the area is. But solidly pro-choice. And when candidates have to defend a anti-choice position, they lose.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is that trolling?!
because they voted against lifting the filibuster hold that would have codified it pre Dobbs. Now they will need 60 votes, and there just won't be anywhere close to that from the right.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is that trolling?!
because they voted against lifting the filibuster hold that would have codified it pre Dobbs. Now they will need 60 votes, and there just won't be anywhere close to that from the right.
Anonymous wrote:I think that’s great!
Anonymous wrote:How is that trolling?!
Anonymous wrote:I could understand the motivation of those up for reelection, but this just seems like a mega-troll effort
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/manchin-co-sponsors-bill-to-codify-roe-v-wade/ar-BB1idvut?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=3a51cf86a57548e09f4201a6d5f9a84e&ei=48
"Sen. Joe Manchin (D) of West Virginia has co-sponsored what his office called in a press release a “bipartisan effort to codify Roe v. Wade.”
This comes after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health ruling in June of 2022, which effectively overturned Roe v. Wade"