Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I take that back. Orientation last year at our school was one hour.
You may ha be been there for an hour, but K orientation has kids and parents coming in and out for two days. That means current kindergarteners miss 2 days of school so rising kindergarteners can have orientation.
You seem to be confusing the short orientation in the spring with the prep session right before school starts in August.
At least at our school, orientation was a scheduled one-hour block, and they were pretty strict about getting you out of there so they could bring the kids back to the classrooms.
I really don't understand why you would think they'd have the kindergarteners miss school those days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I take that back. Orientation last year at our school was one hour.
You may ha be been there for an hour, but K orientation has kids and parents coming in and out for two days. That means current kindergarteners miss 2 days of school so rising kindergarteners can have orientation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:K orientation was nice to give PK kids who are nervous about starting school a chance to meet the teachers, but it was not essential from that perspective—and it meant that K students had to miss a couple of days of school, which is certainly disruptive.
Did teachers find K orientation useful for creating balanced classes? That would be a good reason to keep it in place.
Why would K students miss "a couple days" of school? How long do you think orientation was?
Last year it was two days long.
My kid started kindergarten in MCPS this year. Orientation was 2 hours. I think you chose between two days. Where was it two days long?
But presumably the current kindergartners weren't there those two days? They had to be gone for two days for each incoming kindergartner to get 2 hours in the classroom.
Anonymous wrote:I take that back. Orientation last year at our school was one hour.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:K orientation was nice to give PK kids who are nervous about starting school a chance to meet the teachers, but it was not essential from that perspective—and it meant that K students had to miss a couple of days of school, which is certainly disruptive.
Did teachers find K orientation useful for creating balanced classes? That would be a good reason to keep it in place.
Why would K students miss "a couple days" of school? How long do you think orientation was?
Last year it was two days long.
My kid started kindergarten in MCPS this year. Orientation was 2 hours. I think you chose between two days. Where was it two days long?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:K orientation was nice to give PK kids who are nervous about starting school a chance to meet the teachers, but it was not essential from that perspective—and it meant that K students had to miss a couple of days of school, which is certainly disruptive.
Did teachers find K orientation useful for creating balanced classes? That would be a good reason to keep it in place.
Why would K students miss "a couple days" of school? How long do you think orientation was?
Last year it was two days long.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:K orientation was nice to give PK kids who are nervous about starting school a chance to meet the teachers, but it was not essential from that perspective—and it meant that K students had to miss a couple of days of school, which is certainly disruptive.
Did teachers find K orientation useful for creating balanced classes? That would be a good reason to keep it in place.
Why would K students miss "a couple days" of school? How long do you think orientation was?
Last year it was two days long.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:K orientation was nice to give PK kids who are nervous about starting school a chance to meet the teachers, but it was not essential from that perspective—and it meant that K students had to miss a couple of days of school, which is certainly disruptive.
Did teachers find K orientation useful for creating balanced classes? That would be a good reason to keep it in place.
Why would K students miss "a couple days" of school? How long do you think orientation was?
Anonymous wrote:K orientation was nice to give PK kids who are nervous about starting school a chance to meet the teachers, but it was not essential from that perspective—and it meant that K students had to miss a couple of days of school, which is certainly disruptive.
Did teachers find K orientation useful for creating balanced classes? That would be a good reason to keep it in place.