Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's supposed to be clustering still.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The AAC doesn't do differentiation. Everything the AAC does has to be for all students because of "equity". That's a new change this year, as explained by APS.
The report is just a list of enrichment projects the AAC assisted with that term. No differentiation.
So being identified as gifted has ZERO impact now?
But every class is supposed to have a cluster, and all kids are included in AAC activities…
This is false. Each cluster is now supposed to have a minimum of 10 GT-identified kids, so that there is a baseline number that makes it easier for the teacher to differentiate. Not every classroom will have a GT cluster. Some schools are doing better than others in achieving that number.
The second sentence is true in terms of how APS delivers GT content. Content is pushed-in and the teacher is supposed to make challenging material available to all students. This is why especially in elementary school they highlight how they offer choice boards so that all kids can access advanced materials.
I've never seen an APS AAC Differentiation report. Which schools get this?
To add on, schools with more identified gifted kids will have more cluster classrooms. Sometimes this means a cluster in each class, but not in ever case.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's supposed to be clustering still.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The AAC doesn't do differentiation. Everything the AAC does has to be for all students because of "equity". That's a new change this year, as explained by APS.
The report is just a list of enrichment projects the AAC assisted with that term. No differentiation.
So being identified as gifted has ZERO impact now?
But every class is supposed to have a cluster, and all kids are included in AAC activities…
This is false. Each cluster is now supposed to have a minimum of 10 GT-identified kids, so that there is a baseline number that makes it easier for the teacher to differentiate. Not every classroom will have a GT cluster. Some schools are doing better than others in achieving that number.
The second sentence is true in terms of how APS delivers GT content. Content is pushed-in and the teacher is supposed to make challenging material available to all students. This is why especially in elementary school they highlight how they offer choice boards so that all kids can access advanced materials.
I've never seen an APS AAC Differentiation report. Which schools get this?
To add on, schools with more identified gifted kids will have more cluster classrooms. Sometimes this means a cluster in each class, but not in ever case.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's supposed to be clustering still.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The AAC doesn't do differentiation. Everything the AAC does has to be for all students because of "equity". That's a new change this year, as explained by APS.
The report is just a list of enrichment projects the AAC assisted with that term. No differentiation.
So being identified as gifted has ZERO impact now?
But every class is supposed to have a cluster, and all kids are included in AAC activities…
This is false. Each cluster is now supposed to have a minimum of 10 GT-identified kids, so that there is a baseline number that makes it easier for the teacher to differentiate. Not every classroom will have a GT cluster. Some schools are doing better than others in achieving that number.
The second sentence is true in terms of how APS delivers GT content. Content is pushed-in and the teacher is supposed to make challenging material available to all students. This is why especially in elementary school they highlight how they offer choice boards so that all kids can access advanced materials.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's supposed to be clustering still.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The AAC doesn't do differentiation. Everything the AAC does has to be for all students because of "equity". That's a new change this year, as explained by APS.
The report is just a list of enrichment projects the AAC assisted with that term. No differentiation.
So being identified as gifted has ZERO impact now?
But every class is supposed to have a cluster, and all kids are included in AAC activities…
Anonymous wrote:But every class is supposed to have a cluster, and all kids are included in AAC activities…
Anonymous wrote:There's supposed to be clustering still.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The AAC doesn't do differentiation. Everything the AAC does has to be for all students because of "equity". That's a new change this year, as explained by APS.
The report is just a list of enrichment projects the AAC assisted with that term. No differentiation.
So being identified as gifted has ZERO impact now?
There's supposed to be clustering still.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The AAC doesn't do differentiation. Everything the AAC does has to be for all students because of "equity". That's a new change this year, as explained by APS.
The report is just a list of enrichment projects the AAC assisted with that term. No differentiation.
So being identified as gifted has ZERO impact now?
Anonymous wrote:The AAC doesn't do differentiation. Everything the AAC does has to be for all students because of "equity". That's a new change this year, as explained by APS.
The report is just a list of enrichment projects the AAC assisted with that term. No differentiation.
Anonymous wrote:Because that doesn’t happen. The report is a listing things that might or might not have happened in a given classroom. And because so much is choice your own child might or might not have even done it.