Anonymous
Post 02/08/2024 10:57     Subject: Supreme Court Hearing on 14th Amendment and Trump

Coney-Barrett is actually asking some tough questions.
Anonymous
Post 02/08/2024 10:56     Subject: Supreme Court Hearing on 14th Amendment and Trump

Trump lawyer now saying Congress has to bar Trump from office.
Anonymous
Post 02/08/2024 10:55     Subject: Supreme Court Hearing on 14th Amendment and Trump

I think the court is going to rule he stays on the ballot. I'm curious about the why. This is history ya'll!
Anonymous
Post 02/08/2024 10:53     Subject: Supreme Court Hearing on 14th Amendment and Trump

here's a you tube link which helps me know who is speaking:
https://twitter.com/7Veritas4?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor

Did the Trump lawyer argue that the word officer has separate meanings in two separate parts of one section of the Constitution?
Anonymous
Post 02/08/2024 10:52     Subject: Supreme Court Hearing on 14th Amendment and Trump

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No thread on this yet? I'll start.

I naively thought they would argue he hadn't engaged in inssurrection. They're not....


Their briefs signaled that. They were mostly focused on the hyper-technical argument that the President isn't an officer.

Making it so technical that SCOTUS can find a way to excuse Trump.
Anonymous
Post 02/08/2024 10:50     Subject: Supreme Court Hearing on 14th Amendment and Trump

I don't think they can argue insurrection? Because they have to take up the Colorado case as is, and the state supreme court determined there was. So insurrection is not up for debate. But other points are.
Anonymous
Post 02/08/2024 10:49     Subject: Supreme Court Hearing on 14th Amendment and Trump

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No thread on this yet? I'll start.

I naively thought they would argue he hadn't engaged in inssurrection. They're not....


Their briefs signaled that. They were mostly focused on the hyper-technical argument that the President isn't an officer.

Because they can't argue the fact that he didn't engage...
Anonymous
Post 02/08/2024 10:41     Subject: Supreme Court Hearing on 14th Amendment and Trump

Anonymous wrote:No thread on this yet? I'll start.

I naively thought they would argue he hadn't engaged in inssurrection. They're not....


Their briefs signaled that. They were mostly focused on the hyper-technical argument that the President isn't an officer.
Anonymous
Post 02/08/2024 10:38     Subject: Supreme Court Hearing on 14th Amendment and Trump

Alito vigorously arguing in favor of Trump.
Anonymous
Post 02/08/2024 10:35     Subject: Supreme Court Hearing on 14th Amendment and Trump

The conservative judges want Trump back in.
Anonymous
Post 02/08/2024 10:35     Subject: Supreme Court Hearing on 14th Amendment and Trump

Trump lawyer arguing on the "hold" point.
Anonymous
Post 02/08/2024 10:28     Subject: Supreme Court Hearing on 14th Amendment and Trump

If they have a chance to punt, they'll punt.
Anonymous
Post 02/08/2024 10:22     Subject: Supreme Court Hearing on 14th Amendment and Trump

I wouldn't get too excited. They can ask a lot of questions, each in order to find a way to let him off.

Anonymous
Post 02/08/2024 10:22     Subject: Supreme Court Hearing on 14th Amendment and Trump

I cannot believe I am listening to the stream of oral arguments.
Anonymous
Post 02/08/2024 10:19     Subject: Supreme Court Hearing on 14th Amendment and Trump

No thread on this yet? I'll start.

I naively thought they would argue he hadn't engaged in inssurrection. They're not....