Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If a kid was at Cerritos for 7 years, then Bethesda for 1 year before going to DC United Academy and signing Home Grown contract, does Bethesda get the grant money and not Cerritos?
Bethesda, but Cerritos can still make a claim through FIFA (which this does nothing to address)
Anonymous wrote:If a kid was at Cerritos for 7 years, then Bethesda for 1 year before going to DC United Academy and signing Home Grown contract, does Bethesda get the grant money and not Cerritos?
Anonymous wrote:I actually read this as nothing to do with some club or homegrown development and just some legal BS. BOOOO MLS
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even more reason for clubs to jump ship from ECNL Boys.
You have to jump ship to a waiting vessel or drown.
MLS Next isn't accepting every club that applies, obviously.
And they shouldn't take anybody or everybody. But this is another positive for the current clubs to continue their programs and never think about ECNL. All the while, ECNL will continue to shut out clubs from access to their girls platform if you don't run both unless you're a select number of clubs in the country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even more reason for clubs to jump ship from ECNL Boys.
You have to jump ship to a waiting vessel or drown.
MLS Next isn't accepting every club that applies, obviously.
Anonymous wrote:Even more reason for clubs to jump ship from ECNL Boys.
Anonymous wrote:Read the fine print. Lots of loopholes and the top players should still go overseas and if that happens you get NO MONEY! Just trying to drive players from smaller clubs to MLS with the idea of money coming back. Lots of ways to get out of payment.
"If a player signs their first professional contract with a club outside of MLS or registers with a different team (non-Elite Academy or foreign club) prior to signing an MLS contract, the player’s former Elite Academy will not be eligible for the Development Grant."
Anonymous wrote:Even more reason for clubs to jump ship from ECNL Boys.