Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Short IBM stock. Well they do have a solid AI business.
But requiring people to work in office B instead of office A? A stealth layoff that is only based on location? Seems a terrible way to run a business and bad for morale. IBM should know that the days of office work are coming to an end. Requiring workers to go into an office to be on video calls is highly inefficient and archaic.
If IBM doesn’t want remote workers then it should not allow workers to use Teams and should require use of desk telephones like it’s 2005.
When I am in office I do all my meetings in person. If someone asks for link I respond there is none your staff or manager can catch you up. I personally don’t want to drive, get dressed go to office to talk to you via zoom whine you are in your pajamas playing video games with your camera off.
Anonymous wrote:*Boomers have entered the chat.*
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Short IBM stock. Well they do have a solid AI business.
But requiring people to work in office B instead of office A? A stealth layoff that is only based on location? Seems a terrible way to run a business and bad for morale. IBM should know that the days of office work are coming to an end. Requiring workers to go into an office to be on video calls is highly inefficient and archaic.
If IBM doesn’t want remote workers then it should not allow workers to use Teams and should require use of desk telephones like it’s 2005.
When I am in office I do all my meetings in person. If someone asks for link I respond there is none your staff or manager can catch you up. I personally don’t want to drive, get dressed go to office to talk to you via zoom whine you are in your pajamas playing video games with your camera off.
I do this too. If I'm in the office - you should be too. Otherwise borrow notes from someone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Short IBM stock. Well they do have a solid AI business.
But requiring people to work in office B instead of office A? A stealth layoff that is only based on location? Seems a terrible way to run a business and bad for morale. IBM should know that the days of office work are coming to an end. Requiring workers to go into an office to be on video calls is highly inefficient and archaic.
If IBM doesn’t want remote workers then it should not allow workers to use Teams and should require use of desk telephones like it’s 2005.
When I am in office I do all my meetings in person. If someone asks for link I respond there is none your staff or manager can catch you up. I personally don’t want to drive, get dressed go to office to talk to you via zoom whine you are in your pajamas playing video games with your camera off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Short IBM stock. Well they do have a solid AI business.
But requiring people to work in office B instead of office A? A stealth layoff that is only based on location? Seems a terrible way to run a business and bad for morale. IBM should know that the days of office work are coming to an end. Requiring workers to go into an office to be on video calls is highly inefficient and archaic.
If IBM doesn’t want remote workers then it should not allow workers to use Teams and should require use of desk telephones like it’s 2005.
My one boss restricted personal calls to 5 minutes a day and turned off voice mail as people should answer their damn phone. My computer was restricted to internal email only and no internet. And cell phones not allowed in office. And not talking in office except work related. And we worked 8am to 7pm every day.
We got a lot of work done! I loved it. Why promotions were plentiful and raises and bonuses big and shareholders very happy
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Short IBM stock. Well they do have a solid AI business.
But requiring people to work in office B instead of office A? A stealth layoff that is only based on location? Seems a terrible way to run a business and bad for morale. IBM should know that the days of office work are coming to an end. Requiring workers to go into an office to be on video calls is highly inefficient and archaic.
If IBM doesn’t want remote workers then it should not allow workers to use Teams and should require use of desk telephones like it’s 2005.
When I am in office I do all my meetings in person. If someone asks for link I respond there is none your staff or manager can catch you up. I personally don’t want to drive, get dressed go to office to talk to you via zoom whine you are in your pajamas playing video games with your camera off.
I do this too. If I'm in the office - you should be too. Otherwise borrow notes from someone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Short IBM stock. Well they do have a solid AI business.
But requiring people to work in office B instead of office A? A stealth layoff that is only based on location? Seems a terrible way to run a business and bad for morale. IBM should know that the days of office work are coming to an end. Requiring workers to go into an office to be on video calls is highly inefficient and archaic.
If IBM doesn’t want remote workers then it should not allow workers to use Teams and should require use of desk telephones like it’s 2005.
When I am in office I do all my meetings in person. If someone asks for link I respond there is none your staff or manager can catch you up. I personally don’t want to drive, get dressed go to office to talk to you via zoom whine you are in your pajamas playing video games with your camera off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Short IBM stock. Well they do have a solid AI business.
But requiring people to work in office B instead of office A? A stealth layoff that is only based on location? Seems a terrible way to run a business and bad for morale. IBM should know that the days of office work are coming to an end. Requiring workers to go into an office to be on video calls is highly inefficient and archaic.
If IBM doesn’t want remote workers then it should not allow workers to use Teams and should require use of desk telephones like it’s 2005.
My one boss restricted personal calls to 5 minutes a day and turned off voice mail as people should answer their damn phone. My computer was restricted to internal email only and no internet. And cell phones not allowed in office. And not talking in office except work related. And we worked 8am to 7pm every day.
We got a lot of work done! I loved it. Why promotions were plentiful and raises and bonuses big and shareholders very happy
Anonymous wrote:Short IBM stock. Well they do have a solid AI business.
But requiring people to work in office B instead of office A? A stealth layoff that is only based on location? Seems a terrible way to run a business and bad for morale. IBM should know that the days of office work are coming to an end. Requiring workers to go into an office to be on video calls is highly inefficient and archaic.
If IBM doesn’t want remote workers then it should not allow workers to use Teams and should require use of desk telephones like it’s 2005.
Anonymous wrote:Short IBM stock. Well they do have a solid AI business.
But requiring people to work in office B instead of office A? A stealth layoff that is only based on location? Seems a terrible way to run a business and bad for morale. IBM should know that the days of office work are coming to an end. Requiring workers to go into an office to be on video calls is highly inefficient and archaic.
If IBM doesn’t want remote workers then it should not allow workers to use Teams and should require use of desk telephones like it’s 2005.
Anonymous wrote:This is good to see. The days for slacking are over.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ibm-managers-move-near-office-184216743.html