Anonymous wrote:Grade inflation is terrible at MCPS.
A B in Q1 and a C in Q2 gets you a B for the semester. Many kids slack off in Q2 and Q4 because they know the higher grade will carry them.
MCPS should have pluses and minuses with the letter grades: B+ vs. B- is more informative than just a B
And why does MCPS use an E for failing instead of the widely used F?
No one outside of MCPS understands what an E is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree! I’d also like to see their attendance policy updated- 3 unexcused absences= class failure.
MCPS central office would never allow it. The old Loss of Credit policy was canned because it was deemed "oppressive" and "racist," and I think that one was triggered with 5 unexcused absences. So there's no way they'd instate something even more unforgiving.
How is requiring kids to be in class racist? I just don’t understand MCPS.
Equity apparently means having no standards for anything - at least that is the MCPS definition
No, that's DCUM right-wingers definition
So in your opinion, why is having attendance requirements not acceptable in MCPS?
Anonymous wrote:My son just benefitted from this. Got a C this MP and a B the first MP so he'll get a B for the semester grade, when in all honesty, he deserves a C. But oh well, thems the brakes with MCPS.
This is why I think we need plus/minus grading to offer more nuanced differentiation.
Anonymous wrote:Agree! I’d also like to see their attendance policy updated- 3 unexcused absences= class failure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree! I’d also like to see their attendance policy updated- 3 unexcused absences= class failure.
MCPS central office would never allow it. The old Loss of Credit policy was canned because it was deemed "oppressive" and "racist," and I think that one was triggered with 5 unexcused absences. So there's no way they'd instate something even more unforgiving.
How is requiring kids to be in class racist? I just don’t understand MCPS.
Equity apparently means having no standards for anything - at least that is the MCPS definition
No, that's DCUM right-wingers definition
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree! I’d also like to see their attendance policy updated- 3 unexcused absences= class failure.
MCPS central office would never allow it. The old Loss of Credit policy was canned because it was deemed "oppressive" and "racist," and I think that one was triggered with 5 unexcused absences. So there's no way they'd instate something even more unforgiving.
How is requiring kids to be in class racist? I just don’t understand MCPS.
Equity apparently means having no standards for anything - at least that is the MCPS definition
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree! I’d also like to see their attendance policy updated- 3 unexcused absences= class failure.
MCPS central office would never allow it. The old Loss of Credit policy was canned because it was deemed "oppressive" and "racist," and I think that one was triggered with 5 unexcused absences. So there's no way they'd instate something even more unforgiving.
How is requiring kids to be in class racist? I just don’t understand MCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree! I’d also like to see their attendance policy updated- 3 unexcused absences= class failure.
MCPS central office would never allow it. The old Loss of Credit policy was canned because it was deemed "oppressive" and "racist," and I think that one was triggered with 5 unexcused absences. So there's no way they'd instate something even more unforgiving.
Anonymous wrote:Agree! I’d also like to see their attendance policy updated- 3 unexcused absences= class failure.