Anonymous wrote:It’s also not unusual in California to have to drive 3+ hours to take one of these tests.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you are in CA and are a 'disadvantaged' student, as in discriminated against in college admissions (e.g. Asian, Indian, White) you should take the test. Gives you a leg up when you apply to colleges in saner parts of the country.
Ignorant statement.
Anonymous wrote:If you are in CA and are a 'disadvantaged' student, as in discriminated against in college admissions (e.g. Asian, Indian, White) you should take the test. Gives you a leg up when you apply to colleges in saner parts of the country.
Anonymous wrote:We should all do this and put the college board money making monopoly out of business.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The private schools in CA offer the SAT and ACT to students, it’s the commoners who have to travel or go out of state to take the tests.
This. We’re not in CA but close in the SW. If you’re not in a city or private school that offers it you could have to drive for hours to take it.
Anonymous wrote:The private schools in CA offer the SAT and ACT to students, it’s the commoners who have to travel or go out of state to take the tests.
Anonymous wrote:I’m seeing threads where people suggest colleges are (or will) draw a negative inference if a kid submits their application test optional, UNLESS the kid is from California because the UC schools are test blind.
But there are SAT and ACT test centers in California and there are colleges in California that are not test blind. California kids can and do take the SAT and ACT all the time. So, why would California kids be viewed differently than other kids in terms of a negative inference being drawn if they go test optional?