Anonymous wrote:https://ggwash.org/view/92158/marylands-governor-wants-to-tackle-the-states-housing-shortage
[i]The Housing Expansion and Affordability Act ...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unconstitutional..
The govt is trying to tell owners of private land who they can and cannot sell to. Why shouldn't owners be allowed to sell their properties to someone who is willing to pay over asking price while a renter would only want to pay asking price?
Typical for Dems - more govt control over everything.
Huh? Just study comps and set a price that you want. Either the renter pays it or you put it on the market. Seems like a dumb proposal but ultimately it's harmless. Actually, if the renter chooses to buy, you save yourself realtor commissions and staging costs, so you'll be ahead by at least 5%.

Anonymous wrote:Unconstitutional..
The govt is trying to tell owners of private land who they can and cannot sell to. Why shouldn't owners be allowed to sell their properties to someone who is willing to pay over asking price while a renter would only want to pay asking price?
Typical for Dems - more govt control over everything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:God, I'm glad I don't live in MD.
Oh, the horror. None of us should have to deal with the atrocity of being able to afford homes on basic incomes like our boomer parents did. /s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unconstitutional..
The govt is trying to tell owners of private land who they can and cannot sell to. Why shouldn't owners be allowed to sell their properties to someone who is willing to pay over asking price while a renter would only want to pay asking price?
Typical for Dems - more govt control over everything.
Hate to break it to you but America has had property controls and restrictions on what you can and can't do with your land ever since the Pilgrims stepped off the Mayflower in 1620. Historians on planning and building controls have documented it.
But that said, the problem IS people paying more than asking price. They are creating artificial bubbles in real estate costs.
Anonymous wrote:God, I'm glad I don't live in MD.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unconstitutional..
The govt is trying to tell owners of private land who they can and cannot sell to. Why shouldn't owners be allowed to sell their properties to someone who is willing to pay over asking price while a renter would only want to pay asking price?
Typical for Dems - more govt control over everything.
Hate to break it to you but America has had property controls and restrictions on what you can and can't do with your land ever since the Pilgrims stepped off the Mayflower in 1620. Historians on planning and building controls have documented it.
But that said, the problem IS people paying more than asking price. They are creating artificial bubbles in real estate costs.
Anonymous wrote:Unconstitutional..
The govt is trying to tell owners of private land who they can and cannot sell to. Why shouldn't owners be allowed to sell their properties to someone who is willing to pay over asking price while a renter would only want to pay asking price?
Typical for Dems - more govt control over everything.