Anonymous wrote:You got one thing right, OP. Your kid will never get in. Sorry you didn't fit in there and feel the need to put down thousands and thousands of other people because you're still bitter decades later. You should move on. Georgetown is doing just fine.
Anonymous wrote:So, I went to Georgetown back in the mid 90s and I still live in the area. I attended for free because one of my parents was faculty but I didn't enjoy it. I appreciated graduating with a respectable degree and doing so gratis, but it is not what I would have picked at all. My DS is a senior this year and we did the tour last fall mostly out of it being close by and convenient. It isn't for him either and doubtful he'd get in anyway (1300/3.9, white, athlete), but yesterday they sent us an email basically begging us to apply and iterated several times that the class of 2028 still has several spots open.
So my question is- have they slipped so much that they need to beg kids to apply? Is this some legacy email deal? Is their AO so sloppy that they send this out to any prospect that have an email for?
He's not going to apply, but I can see this being very misleading for the kids that are interested in the school.
Anonymous wrote:Agree with a PP. If anything, Georgetown goes to a lot of trouble to limit applications, not inflate them. My kid spent yesterday filling out their proprietary application, which meant re-filling what she did on the common app (name, address, parent occupation, etc etc) and writing new essays, which are fairly different in length for Georgetown compared to most since they don't take common app essay. They require you submit all test scores, not selected ones, and are not test optional.
I found myself wondering why they are making it so difficult to apply. (I guess it's a way of measuring demonstrated interest?).
(I know where you're coming from, though, OP. I attended in the 80s and probably would have had a better time elsewhere. My kid is applying because academically it's a perfect fit (SFS) and I'd like to keep her close for various reasons. But not sure it's socially the best place for her, either.)
Anonymous wrote:They want to reject more people so the school will have a lower acceptance rate.
For some reason, people equate rejecting more applicant as as “success.” In business, this would look like not doing a good job qualifying prospects. In academia, it’s a goal to have unqualified people apply.
I would only apply if they ask me to apply and their ask is binding—like reverse ED. They would never do that, so I would never apply. 😂
Anonymous wrote:They want to reject more people so the school will have a lower acceptance rate.
For some reason, people equate rejecting more applicant as as “success.” In business, this would look like not doing a good job qualifying prospects. In academia, it’s a goal to have unqualified people apply.
I would only apply if they ask me to apply and their ask is binding—like reverse ED. They would never do that, so I would never apply. 😂
Anonymous wrote:They want to reject more people so the school will have a lower acceptance rate.
For some reason, people equate rejecting more applicant as as “success.” In business, this would look like not doing a good job qualifying prospects. In academia, it’s a goal to have unqualified people apply.
I would only apply if they ask me to apply and their ask is binding—like reverse ED. They would never do that, so I would never apply. 😂