Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:another complaint from the county's complainer-in-chief
Roscoe Nix ES parents are not complainers. They are saddled with an impossible situation and want relief.
And it's not just the parents complaining. Staff have complained about it to the BOE.
It's time for MCPS to kill the innovative school year as yet another theoretical fantasy that is infeasible due to practical realities.
I'm not an educational policy expert (and I hope one weighs in) but ISY is not the most nonsensical or theoretical approach MCPS has ever tried. I agree with you about approaches like "honors for all" that have failed elsewhere, but year-round school has succeeded elsewhere and has a strong theoretical basis.
I've skimmed the report above, as well as the response from MCPS and the overall cover memo from Superintendent McKnight. All of them point to some common problems: staff retention and student attendance.
Staff recruitment retention is an issue in part because a lot of teachers are also parents. There's not much to be done about that, but MCPS has tried to ameliorate the recruitment issue by letting the ISY schools recruit earlier than the traditional calendar schools.
Student attendance is a real problem. According to the report, only 76 percent of Arcola and 79% of Roscoe Nix kids were there on the first day last year. The report also details ongoing attendance issues for the first 30 days of school. So, it could be that the ISY kids are doing about the same as the other kids because they simply aren't attending the ISY portion of the school year.
Honestly, from my layperson's view, the biggest issue here is that you have two schools out of a hundred-something doing a different schedule, which is hard on staff and on students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:another complaint from the county's complainer-in-chief
Roscoe Nix ES parents are not complainers. They are saddled with an impossible situation and want relief.
And it's not just the parents complaining. Staff have complained about it to the BOE.
It's time for MCPS to kill the innovative school year as yet another theoretical fantasy that is infeasible due to practical realities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For what it's worth, MCPS did an evaluation of the ISY model and found no statistical difference in outcomes between the ISY schools and schools with a traditional calendar and similar demographics. The recommendation was not to scale up the ISY model until they figured out why an extra 5 weeks of school wasn't yielding any gains.
https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2023/ISC%20Outcomes%20Eval%202022-2023%20Aug2023_FINAL.pdf
The parents and teachers already know the answer to that question.
Are you one of them? If so, do tell.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For what it's worth, MCPS did an evaluation of the ISY model and found no statistical difference in outcomes between the ISY schools and schools with a traditional calendar and similar demographics. The recommendation was not to scale up the ISY model until they figured out why an extra 5 weeks of school wasn't yielding any gains.
https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2023/ISC%20Outcomes%20Eval%202022-2023%20Aug2023_FINAL.pdf
The parents and teachers already know the answer to that question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:another complaint from the county's complainer-in-chief
Roscoe Nix ES parents are not complainers. They are saddled with an impossible situation and want relief.
Anonymous wrote:For what it's worth, MCPS did an evaluation of the ISY model and found no statistical difference in outcomes between the ISY schools and schools with a traditional calendar and similar demographics. The recommendation was not to scale up the ISY model until they figured out why an extra 5 weeks of school wasn't yielding any gains.
https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2023/ISC%20Outcomes%20Eval%202022-2023%20Aug2023_FINAL.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m surprised it’s taken this long for the parents at the innovative school year schools to complain. I assumed it was because those families generally don’t have as much income and influence. Who would want a school schedule like that?
https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/calendar/FY2024/0953.23_2023-2024_INNOVATIVE_SchoolCalendar.pdf
People who want their young kids in school year-round instead of having 10 weeks of no school in the summer with the associated learning loss and child care responsibilities.
Anonymous wrote:I’m surprised it’s taken this long for the parents at the innovative school year schools to complain. I assumed it was because those families generally don’t have as much income and influence. Who would want a school schedule like that?
Anonymous wrote:another complaint from the county's complainer-in-chief
Anonymous wrote:I’m surprised it’s taken this long for the parents at the innovative school year schools to complain. I assumed it was because those families generally don’t have as much income and influence. Who would want a school schedule like that?