Anonymous wrote:For girls, I'd just average U15/U16/U17 to get an idea of strength. U18/19 can really drop off, because most of the better girls have already signed. Before U15 is still very much developmental and not always a fair reflection. Some clubs are more "win first" than others at the younger ages.
Anonymous wrote:ECNL will put the actual rankings out at the end of year. Cool spreadsheet though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For girls, I'd just average U15/U16/U17 to get an idea of strength. U18/19 can really drop off, because most of the better girls have already signed. Before U15 is still very much developmental and not always a fair reflection. Some clubs are more "win first" than others at the younger ages.
Ha!
Anonymous wrote:For girls, I'd just average U15/U16/U17 to get an idea of strength. U18/19 can really drop off, because most of the better girls have already signed. Before U15 is still very much developmental and not always a fair reflection. Some clubs are more "win first" than others at the younger ages.
Anonymous wrote:If you think winning percentage is an important part of youth sports, at any level, you are part of the problem.
Anonymous wrote:If you think winning percentage is an important part of youth sports, at any level, you are part of the problem.
Anonymous wrote:NVA has the highest win %?