Anonymous wrote:Anyone else see this?
https://moderatelymoco.com/exclusive-mpia-results-mcps-virtual-academy-under-the-microscope-with-a-disappointing-report-card/?amp=1
Not surprising at all. I wonder if the program will continue?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At this point, it's pretty clear that virtual instruction is inferior to in-person and has been for some time. The holdouts want to delude themselves but MCPS should not enable this delusion.
It’s actually shocking to me that MCPS is allowing 900 kids to continue in virtual, including a sizeable number of elementary students. Poor kids!! I think virtual can serve a roll for a very small number of kids with IEPs or temporary medical conditions, but not as an alternative for any kid.
Anonymous wrote:I see lots of absences, is there data if these are excused or unexcused and if they’re related to medical appointments? That is a very high number.
Anonymous wrote:At this point, it's pretty clear that virtual instruction is inferior to in-person and has been for some time. The holdouts want to delude themselves but MCPS should not enable this delusion.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe some of these kids are remote due to psychological or health issues and that is why they are behind versus the remote teaching itself?
Anonymous wrote:Here it is again...parents in this county are so behind the times. Most districts across the country have offered virtual options since the early aughts. The fact MCPS only did in 2020 because of the pandemic is embarrassing. It's time to join the rest of the country in the 21st century without complaining because remote instruction didn't work for your kid during the pandemic. It's so absurd.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe some of these kids are remote due to psychological or health issues and that is why they are behind versus the remote teaching itself?