Anonymous wrote:of course it should be demolished. what kind of creeps would want to live there? no one i'd want to rent to.
i'd say they should wait until after the trial, so the jury has a chance to walk through if they want, but it seems like it's a pretty straightforward case, so maybe no one thinks that'll be necessary.
Anonymous wrote:I understand that it’s the owners right. I completely get it. I just hope that Kohberger doesn’t try and use the lack of house as a tool to get a mistrial or runaround of the facts.