Anonymous
12/14/2023 13:07
Subject: Re:Boundary Review December town halls
Anonymous wrote:Confirmed one of the things being considered is OOB feeder rights. She did mention that it reduced at risk on average by 2-6%.
But that wouldn’t make sense with adding OOB at risk set asides. I’m only half listening though so correct me if I’m wrong.
Anonymous
12/14/2023 12:55
Subject: Boundary Review December town halls
Southern part of Mt Pleasant (south of Irving) will be re-zoned out of Deal-JR and instead sent to CHEC and Cardozo. Core wealthy section of Mount P still retains their moat of protection in Deal-JR.
No change to Shepherd, as widely predicted.
No change to Shepherd, as widely predicted.
Anonymous
12/14/2023 12:47
Subject: Boundary Review December town halls
Looks like Hardy and MacArthur will take more of Woodley Park (that currently feeds O-A and JR) and western parts of AU Park (that currently feed to Deal-JR).
Not sure how all these additional kids will be squeezed into Hardy.
Not sure how all these additional kids will be squeezed into Hardy.
Anonymous
12/14/2023 12:43
Subject: Boundary Review December town halls
I feel seen and heard. All the strategies I've suggested are being discussed. Highest among them would be at risk set aside for all schools until said school is 30% at risk. By name, they said biggest opportunity schools would be Brent, Lafayette, and Oyster Adams.
Anonymous
12/14/2023 12:35
Subject: Re:Boundary Review December town halls
Confirmed one of the things being considered is OOB feeder rights. She did mention that it reduced at risk on average by 2-6%.
Anonymous
Anonymous
12/14/2023 12:04
Subject: Boundary Review December town halls
We looked at what would happen if we modified Wells/Coolidge boundaries and it causes too many problems for the feeder elementaries. Really the only options left are reducing OOB seats and recommending building expansion and/or moving Wells to another (TBD) facility.
Anonymous
12/14/2023 12:03
Subject: Re:Boundary Review December town halls
Meeting happening right now in case anyone wants to join
Anonymous
12/14/2023 06:21
Subject: Boundary Review December town halls
It sounds like Janney and Mann boundaries are being considered (which I honestly don’t remember being mentioned before)
Anonymous
12/13/2023 22:20
Subject: Re:Boundary Review December town halls
So the direct meetings with the schools impacted...
What are the changes being considered for Janney and Wells? Anyone know?
https://dme.dc.gov/node/1688576
What are the changes being considered for Janney and Wells? Anyone know?
https://dme.dc.gov/node/1688576
Anonymous
12/13/2023 21:58
Subject: Re:Boundary Review December town halls
Any synopsis on a global perspective?
Anonymous
12/13/2023 20:52
Subject: Boundary Review December town halls
You might find this helpful: https://www.dcschoolboundaryexplorer.com/
Anonymous
12/13/2023 20:02
Subject: Boundary Review December town halls
I believe I’m understanding this right- Bancroft will retain deal-JR. there are still options being considered for a dual language feeder for MS/HS and annex option for PreK.
Anonymous
12/13/2023 18:58
Subject: Boundary Review December town halls
The interactive site has details about any proposed changes
https://www.dcschoolboundaryexplorer.com/
https://www.dcschoolboundaryexplorer.com/
Anonymous
12/13/2023 08:00
Subject: Boundary Review December town halls
Any intel from the first one last night? I’m not sure I’ll be able attend the remaining two. Were proposed scenarios shared?