Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would think these dumb kids would get a new playbook. This hasn't ended well for the other dummies who've pulled this exact same stunt this school year.

What? The 12 yr old who called in the previous bomb threats will no be punished because he's "too young."

He's not in jail or charged, but there were MCPS-imposed consequences, supposedly.

I didn't realize MCPS had its legal system. I thought they were a school system. Isn't this more of a decision for state/county authorities?

Yes the school probably won’t even remove him. My DC was a victim of harassment and was told you should look for a new school. Public education is a right. I kid you not

Same. We did because two ER visits are enough

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would think these dumb kids would get a new playbook. This hasn't ended well for the other dummies who've pulled this exact same stunt this school year.

What? The 12 yr old who called in the previous bomb threats will no be punished because he's "too young."

He's not in jail or charged, but there were MCPS-imposed consequences, supposedly.

I didn't realize MCPS had its legal system. I thought they were a school system. Isn't this more of a decision for state/county authorities?

MCPS is responsible for student discipline and he was supposedly disciplined in accordance to this level of violation in the student Code of Conduct. What that punishment was, we won't know because FERPA.

Did they commit this act on school grounds even? Don't we have real laws that govern this? MCPS isn't equipped to be doling out justice. Seriously, what if a kid committed a capital crime would they just ask MCPS to dole out punishment? This is nuts especially since it likely didn't even happen at school.

Anonymous wrote:They will probably celebrate the person who called in the threat at Wootton. All the other threats were at east county schools. So this was an act of education justice.

They will probably celebrate the person who called in the threat at Wootton. All the other threats were at east county schools. So this was an act of education justice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would think these dumb kids would get a new playbook. This hasn't ended well for the other dummies who've pulled this exact same stunt this school year.

What? The 12 yr old who called in the previous bomb threats will no be punished because he's "too young."

He's not in jail or charged, but there were MCPS-imposed consequences, supposedly.

I didn't realize MCPS had its legal system. I thought they were a school system. Isn't this more of a decision for state/county authorities?

Yes the school probably won’t even remove him. My DC was a victim of harassment and was told you should look for a new school. Public education is a right. I kid you not

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would think these dumb kids would get a new playbook. This hasn't ended well for the other dummies who've pulled this exact same stunt this school year.

What? The 12 yr old who called in the previous bomb threats will no be punished because he's "too young."

He's not in jail or charged, but there were MCPS-imposed consequences, supposedly.

I didn't realize MCPS had its legal system. I thought they were a school system. Isn't this more of a decision for state/county authorities?

MCPS is responsible for student discipline and he was supposedly disciplined in accordance to this level of violation in the student Code of Conduct. What that punishment was, we won't know because FERPA.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would think these dumb kids would get a new playbook. This hasn't ended well for the other dummies who've pulled this exact same stunt this school year.

What? The 12 yr old who called in the previous bomb threats will no be punished because he's "too young."

He's not in jail or charged, but there were MCPS-imposed consequences, supposedly.

I didn't realize MCPS had its legal system. I thought they were a school system. Isn't this more of a decision for state/county authorities?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would think these dumb kids would get a new playbook. This hasn't ended well for the other dummies who've pulled this exact same stunt this school year.

What? The 12 yr old who called in the previous bomb threats will no be punished because he's "too young."

He's not in jail or charged, but there were MCPS-imposed consequences, supposedly.

Ooooooo. He's not going to like pretending to apologize in that restorative justice circle one bit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would think these dumb kids would get a new playbook. This hasn't ended well for the other dummies who've pulled this exact same stunt this school year.

What? The 12 yr old who called in the previous bomb threats will no be punished because he's "too young."

He's not in jail or charged, but there were MCPS-imposed consequences, supposedly.

Anonymous wrote:You would think these dumb kids would get a new playbook. This hasn't ended well for the other dummies who've pulled this exact same stunt this school year.

What? The 12 yr old who called in the previous bomb threats will no be punished because he's "too young."

You would think these dumb kids would get a new playbook. This hasn't ended well for the other dummies who've pulled this exact same stunt this school year.

We desperately need another anti-racism audit.

It’s too cold for pranks

Thankfully, all clear.

I guess kids are at it again. There goes the neighborhood! W

https://x.com/mcpnews/status/1729137073603674352?s=46&t=R3AX3c486LFdeZpFtkN_eA