Anonymous wrote:I was just looking through Careers, and saw this job advertised. Is this a new role? Do we really need ANOTHER employee not working with students.
To be fair, I do think the BOE as part-time employees have way too much on their plate. However, I don’t feel positive thoughts about another fill time position going just toward communications (salary is at the administrator level).
So, is this new? Or is someone leaving? How can we get more teachers and less office bloat?
Anonymous wrote:I still want to know how many people work in the central office. MCPS has 11,300 non-teaching staff which is 2x the number that Fairfax Co has. MCPS is insanely bloated.
Anonymous wrote:The biggest issue is that generally central office positions are internal hires so we take teachers out of the classroom and put them in office positions leaving the direct student contact position open.
Anonymous wrote:Actually, mcps predetermines how much money will be needed on salaries for the next year. It's set aside and salary is set by the mcea contract. So this position literally does nothing for or against teaching jobs or salaries. All those empty teaching positions don't mean more money for teachers either. Any new positions don't take away money from anyone. Currently working teachers will continue to get paid exactly the same until the next negotiation. And you calling a stranger an idiot is the exact reason why teachers don't want to deal with a holes and their kids.
Anonymous wrote:You could post 20 board positions and it wouldn't make a difference on teaching jobs. They are separate budgets and no one wants to teach anymore because entitled parents have raised entitled children
Anonymous wrote:You could post 20 board positions and it wouldn't make a difference on teaching jobs. They are separate budgets and no one wants to teach anymore because entitled parents have raised entitled children