Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP are you aware that there are kids out there with 99% MAP-M several grades up? Yes there are kids doing this with outside enrichment, but there are those truly bright kids that can do without.
True maybe 1 out of 30 of the kids in these programs got there without outside enrichment. They inevitably have highly educated parents who were able to provide the enrichment necessary to make the cut. Kids aren't born magically knowing advanced math.
Anonymous wrote:OP are you aware that there are kids out there with 99% MAP-M several grades up? Yes there are kids doing this with outside enrichment, but there are those truly bright kids that can do without.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP are you aware that there are kids out there with 99% MAP-M several grades up? Yes there are kids doing this with outside enrichment, but there are those truly bright kids that can do without.
Yes, I'm aware, and I really didn't mean for this to be about my individual child's chances. Perhaps I wrote my original post poorly. I was mostly curious about whether a highly capable, "truly bright" kid (not necessarily my kid) that attends a "regular" middle school that doesn't have math or science-oriented clubs or teams has a reasonable chance at admission and success, especially compared to students from schools that do provide those opportunities. It sounds like the answer is yes, and that's good. I've definitely spent too much time reading DCUM threads about things like math team competitions and robotics clubs at some schools, and I'm glad to get this reality check.
Anonymous wrote:DC is at a high poverty middle school with none of the clubs you listed but we get emails all the time about FREE enrichment activities. Free after school coding camps, free weekend math opportunities, free science activities.
Some of these are sponsored by MCPS and many take place at the school or are virtual.
Kids who are interested can take advantage of these opportunities.
Why would your child even want to go to a STEM magnet if your child has shown no interest? You sound like someone who can afford to enrich but you are just trying to stir up trouble and use this opportunity to bash "certain ethnic groups."
Anonymous wrote:OP are you aware that there are kids out there with 99% MAP-M several grades up? Yes there are kids doing this with outside enrichment, but there are those truly bright kids that can do without.
Anonymous wrote:This is such a loaded question. Your attitude is really off-putting.
Of course the regular MCPS curriculum is fine preparation for admission and success. Only a small percentage are coming from the MS stem magnets. The rest are from regular middle schools and many of them don't have STEM activities and they all do fine.
The ones who have enrichment will find it easier initially as you might expect but things will equalize quickly as more opportunities are opened up to the other kids.
Anonymous wrote:As my 8th grader has been working on high school applications and choices, I've been thinking about the math/science magnet programs and wondering about who exactly they serve. I'll say up front that I don't mean this to be whining or complaining about my kid's chances; I'll be happy (and somewhat relieved and not at all surprised) if they end up at our home high school. But I'm curious about whether the MCPS middle school curriculum, on its own and without outside enrichment/activities, are enough to prepare a "highly able learner" for admission to and success in the magnet. If so, that's great. If not, is this reasonable for a taxpayer-funded, public school program?
As an example, my kid goes to an MCPS middle school. Their school has no math team, no science fair, no robotics club, no computer science classes, and no real math/science enrichment opportunities beyond the regular accelerated curriculum (getting through geometry in 8th grade). However, my kid and some of their friends are straight-A students with 99%+ test scores; they are bright, curious, "highly capable", and were in the lottery pool for the MS magnets but didn't get spots. Do kids like this have any chance at admission without having some kind of (privately funded, parent-enabled) extracurricular math or science focused activity? And if they get in, would the standard MCPS curriculum have prepared them enough to be successful, with hard work but with access only to the school-provided resources?
I understand that there are far more qualified students than spaces in the magnet, and the argument that access should be increased. I feel like my question is a little different, though. Are these programs only for those who have gone beyond the standard MCPS curriculum? If so, is that appropriate and fair? I'd love to hear experiences or opinions.
Anonymous wrote:My child didn’t have any of the extra things you mentioned and is doing well at Blair.
They are a child who has been exceptionally quick to learn, self motivated and organized since they were very young. Precociously academic from an extremely young age. I think the speed of learning and organizational skills are key to success and they are lucky that those things come easily to them.
Anonymous wrote:My child didn’t have any of the extra things you mentioned and is doing well at Blair.
They are a child who has been exceptionally quick to learn, self motivated and organized since they were very young. Precociously academic from an extremely young age. I think the speed of learning and organizational skills are key to success and they are lucky that those things come easily to them.