Anonymous wrote:There is no way the Dem party will let Trone win. How embarrassing on the national stage for them to have two white men as Senators. They are too much about “identity politics,” as our friend the PP espouses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There have been threads about it but this one can apply to both Ds and Rs.
The political establishment is lining up behind Alsobrooks, but Trone has all the money. Both are politically moderate Democrats.
I personally think Maryland could do better. I’m not far left by any means, but since national politics has been driven so far to the right, I’d rather see blue states like Maryland counterbalance that with someone more left-leaning. I wish Raskin would run.
I’m leaning towards Angela admittedly for identity politics reasons. When all other things are equal (in this case, equally mid) I’ll vote for the women of color.
This all being said, what are the chances for the R candidates? The only one I know is Robin Ficker. He never ceases to entertain, I look forward to his presidential campaign kickoff in 2028. But what about the serious Republican candidates? Since Larry Hogan isn’t running, does anyone other than a clone named Harry Logan have a chance? Could Rs peel off enough young Black men to flip Maryland?
What does this even mean? You're like a caricature of the extreme left with this.
It means that if both candidates are equally good or bad, then I’ll resort to identity politics if there are no other distinguishing factors.
It’s hard to believe that there are truly no distinguishing factors regarding their policy positions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There have been threads about it but this one can apply to both Ds and Rs.
The political establishment is lining up behind Alsobrooks, but Trone has all the money. Both are politically moderate Democrats.
I personally think Maryland could do better. I’m not far left by any means, but since national politics has been driven so far to the right, I’d rather see blue states like Maryland counterbalance that with someone more left-leaning. I wish Raskin would run.
I’m leaning towards Angela admittedly for identity politics reasons. When all other things are equal (in this case, equally mid) I’ll vote for the women of color.
This all being said, what are the chances for the R candidates? The only one I know is Robin Ficker. He never ceases to entertain, I look forward to his presidential campaign kickoff in 2028. But what about the serious Republican candidates? Since Larry Hogan isn’t running, does anyone other than a clone named Harry Logan have a chance? Could Rs peel off enough young Black men to flip Maryland?
What does this even mean? You're like a caricature of the extreme left with this.
It means that if both candidates are equally good or bad, then I’ll resort to identity politics if there are no other distinguishing factors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There have been threads about it but this one can apply to both Ds and Rs.
The political establishment is lining up behind Alsobrooks, but Trone has all the money. Both are politically moderate Democrats.
I personally think Maryland could do better. I’m not far left by any means, but since national politics has been driven so far to the right, I’d rather see blue states like Maryland counterbalance that with someone more left-leaning. I wish Raskin would run.
I’m leaning towards Angela admittedly for identity politics reasons. When all other things are equal (in this case, equally mid) I’ll vote for the women of color.
This all being said, what are the chances for the R candidates? The only one I know is Robin Ficker. He never ceases to entertain, I look forward to his presidential campaign kickoff in 2028. But what about the serious Republican candidates? Since Larry Hogan isn’t running, does anyone other than a clone named Harry Logan have a chance? Could Rs peel off enough young Black men to flip Maryland?
What does this even mean? You're like a caricature of the extreme left with this.
Anonymous wrote:There have been threads about it but this one can apply to both Ds and Rs.
The political establishment is lining up behind Alsobrooks, but Trone has all the money. Both are politically moderate Democrats.
I personally think Maryland could do better. I’m not far left by any means, but since national politics has been driven so far to the right, I’d rather see blue states like Maryland counterbalance that with someone more left-leaning. I wish Raskin would run.
I’m leaning towards Angela admittedly for identity politics reasons. When all other things are equal (in this case, equally mid) I’ll vote for the women of color.
This all being said, what are the chances for the R candidates? The only one I know is Robin Ficker. He never ceases to entertain, I look forward to his presidential campaign kickoff in 2028. But what about the serious Republican candidates? Since Larry Hogan isn’t running, does anyone other than a clone named Harry Logan have a chance? Could Rs peel off enough young Black men to flip Maryland?
Anonymous wrote:Hogan is the strongest R candidate, followed by Boyd Rutherford, but I believe neither plan to run. That means it'll be between Trone and Alsobrooks. I'll choose Trone since I like his business acumen and I don't vote for candidates based on being POC or not.
But I'm also an independent so I can't choose in the closed primaries we have in MD anywayy...
Anonymous wrote:Hogan is the strongest R candidate, followed by Boyd Rutherford, but I believe neither plan to run. That means it'll be between Trone and Alsobrooks. I'll choose Trone since I like his business acumen and I don't vote for candidates based on being POC or not.
But I'm also an independent so I can't choose in the closed primaries we have in MD anywayy...