Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Group work is fine when it's evaluated correctly. The teacher should be making sure that everyone has a role and a responsibility. The teacher should be grading on a rubric based on the roles and responsibilities. Kids need to learn that sometimes tasks can't be accomplished by one person, and often that lesson is learned when they completely and utterly fail to get it done when they don't work together. A good grading policy would be individual grading for the project itself base on successful completion of roles and responsibilities and then incentive for the whole group for successfully completing the project.
The lesson is that the kid who cares most learns that with enough time and efforts tasks intended for a group can be accomplished by one person. Group projects are a way to bring up slackers' grades by pairing them with kids who teachers know will do what they need to for a good grade
Give me a break, nobody is exploiting OP’s precious child’s work. How much does the group project even counts for the grade, 10%? It matters little for the fuss op is making. They are usually easy enough that a motivated student just dies is with ease. The issue is OP thinks her child is taking advantage of.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Group work is fine when it's evaluated correctly. The teacher should be making sure that everyone has a role and a responsibility. The teacher should be grading on a rubric based on the roles and responsibilities. Kids need to learn that sometimes tasks can't be accomplished by one person, and often that lesson is learned when they completely and utterly fail to get it done when they don't work together. A good grading policy would be individual grading for the project itself base on successful completion of roles and responsibilities and then incentive for the whole group for successfully completing the project.
The lesson is that the kid who cares most learns that with enough time and efforts tasks intended for a group can be accomplished by one person. Group projects are a way to bring up slackers' grades by pairing them with kids who teachers know will do what they need to for a good grade
Anonymous wrote:Group work is fine when it's evaluated correctly. The teacher should be making sure that everyone has a role and a responsibility. The teacher should be grading on a rubric based on the roles and responsibilities. Kids need to learn that sometimes tasks can't be accomplished by one person, and often that lesson is learned when they completely and utterly fail to get it done when they don't work together. A good grading policy would be individual grading for the project itself base on successful completion of roles and responsibilities and then incentive for the whole group for successfully completing the project.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not only does DD need to manage her own work but she needs to manage three other students in her AP class who have no interest in doing the actual work. At what point does she go to the teacher? Or her counselor?
What do you mean she’s “managing” other three students? Seems doubtful that all three students in an AP class have no interest in doing the actual work, can you give more details? Go to the teacher to do what, change groups, give her heads up the project will suck? What would going to the counselor accomplish, since she’s not teaching the class?
The entire post seems like a big whine.
You’ve never been on a group project where one person has to pull the rest of the team along? Really?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not only does DD need to manage her own work but she needs to manage three other students in her AP class who have no interest in doing the actual work. At what point does she go to the teacher? Or her counselor?
What do you mean she’s “managing” other three students? Seems doubtful that all three students in an AP class have no interest in doing the actual work, can you give more details? Go to the teacher to do what, change groups, give her heads up the project will suck? What would going to the counselor accomplish, since she’s not teaching the class?
The entire post seems like a big whine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not only does DD need to manage her own work but she needs to manage three other students in her AP class who have no interest in doing the actual work. At what point does she go to the teacher? Or her counselor?
What do you mean she’s “managing” other three students? Seems doubtful that all three students in an AP class have no interest in doing the actual work, can you give more details? Go to the teacher to do what, change groups, give her heads up the project will suck? What would going to the counselor accomplish, since she’s not teaching the class?
The entire post seems like a big whine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not only does DD need to manage her own work but she needs to manage three other students in her AP class who have no interest in doing the actual work. At what point does she go to the teacher? Or her counselor?
What do you mean she’s “managing” other three students? Seems doubtful that all three students in an AP class have no interest in doing the actual work, can you give more details? Go to the teacher to do what, change groups, give her heads up the project will suck? What would going to the counselor accomplish, since she’s not teaching the class?
The entire post seems like a big whine.
Anonymous wrote:Not only does DD need to manage her own work but she needs to manage three other students in her AP class who have no interest in doing the actual work. At what point does she go to the teacher? Or her counselor?
Anonymous wrote: Group projects are a tool of the patriarchy that teach girls that their role in the workplace is to disproportionately do unglamorous grunt work where as boys get to be creative “leaders “.
https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/01/group-projects-and-the-secretary-effect/384104/
Burn them to the ground!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Group projects are a tool of the patriarchy that teach girls that their role in the workplace is to disproportionately do unglamorous grunt work where as boys get to be creative “leaders “.
https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/01/group-projects-and-the-secretary-effect/384104/
Burn them to the ground!
Haha! Thanks for the laugh!
Do you disagree with the premise? I sure don’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Group projects are a tool of the patriarchy that teach girls that their role in the workplace is to disproportionately do unglamorous grunt work where as boys get to be creative “leaders “.
https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/01/group-projects-and-the-secretary-effect/384104/
Burn them to the ground!
Haha! Thanks for the laugh!
Anonymous wrote: Group projects are a tool of the patriarchy that teach girls that their role in the workplace is to disproportionately do unglamorous grunt work where as boys get to be creative “leaders “.
https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/01/group-projects-and-the-secretary-effect/384104/
Burn them to the ground!