Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And how much did they pay him? Sidwell did, and recommended his book. Will there be any sort of mea culpa from the administrators who thought it was a good idea to force our kids to listen to him?
https://www.bu.edu/articles/2023/bu-launches-inquiry-into-center-for-antiracist-research/
I’m confused. This article talks about how the school is looking into his restructuring of his center from a grants-seeking organization to a fellowship-based model, resulting in layoffs of more than half the staff (19 people). It says nothing against his views or book, in fact all the quotes from BU admin specifically recognize the importance of his views and vision and say they look forward to continuing to work with him. How do you se this article as some kind of indictment that would require a mea culpa from schools that read his book or had him speak?
Anonymous wrote:I’m not white but I think Kendi is way over hyped. I think he is divisive which is not helpful in any type of long term strategy.
People are getting tired of his rhetoric.
How much did these schools pay him to come speak?
Anonymous wrote:And how much did they pay him? Sidwell did, and recommended his book. Will there be any sort of mea culpa from the administrators who thought it was a good idea to force our kids to listen to him?
https://www.bu.edu/articles/2023/bu-launches-inquiry-into-center-for-antiracist-research/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not sure what you're getting at?
The issue as I see it is that Kendi relied on a grant model in his center to advance the agenda. I work in a university and have grants. They are relentless. They are not super equitable about who does how much work and how much they are compensated. They are grueling. They are very top-down and rigid. Looks like that was all felt at his center and he's re-imagining it to be a fellowship model, which seems much more equitable and manageable and probably a better fit; that said, grants are a good way to get funded, so there are negatives, too. Totally understandable that people would gripe about working conditions and restructuring (both are so so common in universities) and that he would respond with a shift accordingly, with the support of the Provost.
This is not an indictment of his character or views or values at all. This is an office management shake up. It has no relationship with the content of his book or his actual thought-leadership.
If accurate, the accounts of workplace conditions at the center are an indictment of his character. You can agree or disagree with his ideas, views, and values, but it is indisputable that he is not willing to engage in free debate about his views, and his proposed solution for addressing systemic racism involves totalitarian measures.
Anonymous wrote:I am not sure what you're getting at?
The issue as I see it is that Kendi relied on a grant model in his center to advance the agenda. I work in a university and have grants. They are relentless. They are not super equitable about who does how much work and how much they are compensated. They are grueling. They are very top-down and rigid. Looks like that was all felt at his center and he's re-imagining it to be a fellowship model, which seems much more equitable and manageable and probably a better fit; that said, grants are a good way to get funded, so there are negatives, too. Totally understandable that people would gripe about working conditions and restructuring (both are so so common in universities) and that he would respond with a shift accordingly, with the support of the Provost.
This is not an indictment of his character or views or values at all. This is an office management shake up. It has no relationship with the content of his book or his actual thought-leadership.
this, so money spent on performance not substance. And then they keep asking parents to donate moreAnonymous wrote:It made schools feel good about themselves. I am a liberal and thus would have preferred any money spent on the DEI train would have instead been spent on scholarships for URMs.
Anonymous wrote:I am not sure what you're getting at?
The issue as I see it is that Kendi relied on a grant model in his center to advance the agenda. I work in a university and have grants. They are relentless. They are not super equitable about who does how much work and how much they are compensated. They are grueling. They are very top-down and rigid. Looks like that was all felt at his center and he's re-imagining it to be a fellowship model, which seems much more equitable and manageable and probably a better fit; that said, grants are a good way to get funded, so there are negatives, too. Totally understandable that people would gripe about working conditions and restructuring (both are so so common in universities) and that he would respond with a shift accordingly, with the support of the Provost.
This is not an indictment of his character or views or values at all. This is an office management shake up. It has no relationship with the content of his book or his actual thought-leadership.