Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. I have a disabled child, but I won't automatically give him more. If he were entirely unable to work or fend for himself, sure. I have a cousin with a trust fund in that situation. But for people who can manage, I think life should play out. Maybe my more functional child will have a devastating life event. No one know what will happen. I don't know who will have kids, and who will have greater needs.
My family tore each other apart due to my grandfather's legally problematic will. It took 25 years to get it overturned in court, and now various people aren't talking to each other.
So equal shares is my go-to.
OP here. Both siblings are completely able to fend for themselves. It's certainly possible either could get laid off. There will be no more children from either sibling.
OP, why are you thinking about money that belongs to your parents? What they leave and how much of it they leave to each person is a bonus and not an expectation. Live your life and don't expect these things.
OP here. The parents brought it up and asked for thoughts ... that's why. Also the will is currently 50/50 and they are proposing revising it. No one expects anything. It's a situation being presented for thoughts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. I have a disabled child, but I won't automatically give him more. If he were entirely unable to work or fend for himself, sure. I have a cousin with a trust fund in that situation. But for people who can manage, I think life should play out. Maybe my more functional child will have a devastating life event. No one know what will happen. I don't know who will have kids, and who will have greater needs.
My family tore each other apart due to my grandfather's legally problematic will. It took 25 years to get it overturned in court, and now various people aren't talking to each other.
So equal shares is my go-to.
OP here. Both siblings are completely able to fend for themselves. It's certainly possible either could get laid off. There will be no more children from either sibling.
OP, why are you thinking about money that belongs to your parents? What they leave and how much of it they leave to each person is a bonus and not an expectation. Live your life and don't expect these things.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. I have a disabled child, but I won't automatically give him more. If he were entirely unable to work or fend for himself, sure. I have a cousin with a trust fund in that situation. But for people who can manage, I think life should play out. Maybe my more functional child will have a devastating life event. No one know what will happen. I don't know who will have kids, and who will have greater needs.
My family tore each other apart due to my grandfather's legally problematic will. It took 25 years to get it overturned in court, and now various people aren't talking to each other.
So equal shares is my go-to.
OP here. Both siblings are completely able to fend for themselves. It's certainly possible either could get laid off. There will be no more children from either sibling.
Anonymous wrote:No. I have a disabled child, but I won't automatically give him more. If he were entirely unable to work or fend for himself, sure. I have a cousin with a trust fund in that situation. But for people who can manage, I think life should play out. Maybe my more functional child will have a devastating life event. No one know what will happen. I don't know who will have kids, and who will have greater needs.
My family tore each other apart due to my grandfather's legally problematic will. It took 25 years to get it overturned in court, and now various people aren't talking to each other.
So equal shares is my go-to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sure. I would leave my child, who has some health issues, a lot more than the one who doesn't.
Also, I would consider their life circumstances outside of health.
Would the extra money actually make a difference for the child with health issues? Would it be worth the possible sibling friction from the sibling who feels symbolically (and actually!) less valued?
Anonymous wrote:OP here... would you consider financial situations? Sibling A has made no effort to save and has made many life decisions that have put them in a lesser financial situation (though far from destitute). Sibling B makes a decent income (but not extravagant) but lives very frugally and has saved since the first job out of college when they made a very meager salary.
Sibling A is also child free and Sibling B is not.
Curious the thoughts on this?
Anonymous wrote:Sure. I would leave my child, who has some health issues, a lot more than the one who doesn't.
Also, I would consider their life circumstances outside of health.