Anonymous wrote:There clearly is a huge acceptance rate in ED, so yes, there is an advantage. Further, recruited athletes are told to apply EA so they are not in the ED applicant pool like they are at other schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Website says it doesn’t. But they have historically accepted a larger percentage in ED than EA or RD.
My guess:
They may be implying that you don’t have a “better” chance in general; acceptance depends on other factors – like the cohort of applicants. (maybe in the year that they had a higher acceptance rate, more highly qualified applicants apply during that time.)
Versus some schools who say that they specifically aim to fill half of their class from ED applicants. UVA does that make that claim.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Website says it doesn’t. But they have historically accepted a larger percentage in ED than EA or RD.
My guess:
They may be implying that you don’t have a “better” chance in general; acceptance depends on other factors – like the cohort of applicants. (maybe in the year that they had a higher acceptance rate, more highly qualified applicants apply during that time.)
Versus some schools who say that they specifically aim to fill half of their class from ED applicants. UVA does that make that claim.
Anonymous wrote:Website says it doesn’t. But they have historically accepted a larger percentage in ED than EA or RD.
Anonymous wrote:I looked at our school’s naviance for uva ED vs EA and I didn’t see a difference.
Anonymous wrote:There clearly is a huge acceptance rate in ED, so yes, there is an advantage. Further, recruited athletes are told to apply EA so they are not in the ED applicant pool like they are at other schools.