Anonymous
Post 09/21/2023 23:09     Subject: Why are "lockdowns" bad but "shutdowns" good?
Ironically, the "lockdowns" happened under a Republican president, so ??????
Anonymous
Post 09/21/2023 17:00     Subject: Why are "lockdowns" bad but "shutdowns" good?
Anonymous wrote:Because they don’t understand public health but they do hate the government and everything it represents. They love shoving sticks in the wheels of the government. It’s their same sociopathy.

Yep. Grandpa always said "the only thing worse than a Democratic politician is a Republican politician". My god have I come to find out what he was speaking of.
Anonymous
Post 09/21/2023 16:57     Subject: Why are "lockdowns" bad but "shutdowns" good?
Because...it's FREEDOM!
Anonymous
Post 09/21/2023 16:22     Subject: Why are "lockdowns" bad but "shutdowns" good?
Because they don’t understand public health but they do hate the government and everything it represents. They love shoving sticks in the wheels of the government. It’s their same sociopathy.
Anonymous
Post 09/21/2023 16:19     Subject: Why are "lockdowns" bad but "shutdowns" good?
What do you think is the difference between a lockdown and a shutdown, op?
Anonymous
Post 09/21/2023 16:16     Subject: Why are "lockdowns" bad but "shutdowns" good?
Republicans love government shutdowns but they think "lockdowns" are crimes against humanity. Why?