Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Athletic preference can't die soon enough. It takes more seats from academically qualified applicants than legacy and development cases combined.
Sorry, you are jealous, but recruited Athletes don’t “take seats” from non- athletes.
+1
College recruited athletes often go through a separate admissions process, and some argue that this can sometimes lead to a perception that they take seats away from other non-recruited students. However, colleges typically have a certain number of spots allocated for athletes, and these spots are separate from the general admissions pool. So, while there might be debate around this topic, recruited athletes usually don't directly take seats from other non-recruited students.
That to me is semantics. It may be separate pool but there are most certainly some Ivy League schools where a relatively large percentage of the class is recruited athletes.
Anonymous wrote:
Athletic preference can't die soon enough. It takes more seats from academically qualified applicants than legacy and development cases combined.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Athletic preference can't die soon enough. It takes more seats from academically qualified applicants than legacy and development cases combined.
Sorry, you are jealous, but recruited Athletes don’t “take seats” from non- athletes.
+1
College recruited athletes often go through a separate admissions process, and some argue that this can sometimes lead to a perception that they take seats away from other non-recruited students. However, colleges typically have a certain number of spots allocated for athletes, and these spots are separate from the general admissions pool. So, while there might be debate around this topic, recruited athletes usually don't directly take seats from other non-recruited students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Athletic preference can't die soon enough. It takes more seats from academically qualified applicants than legacy and development cases combined.
Sorry, you are jealous, but recruited Athletes don’t “take seats” from non- athletes.
Anonymous wrote:
Athletic preference can't die soon enough. It takes more seats from academically qualified applicants than legacy and development cases combined.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hearing of several students already in at their chosen schools (athletic recruits, obvi.) Great news for them. Can't wait until this process is over for my DC!
Pretty sure this is not true. New NCAA rules prevent any commitments prior to HS junior year.
I'm referring to this year's seniors (high school class of '24) who, once admitted, are part of the college class of 2028.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hearing of several students already in at their chosen schools (athletic recruits, obvi.) Great news for them. Can't wait until this process is over for my DC!
Pretty sure this is not true. New NCAA rules prevent any commitments prior to HS junior year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hearing of several students already in at their chosen schools (athletic recruits, obvi.) Great news for them. Can't wait until this process is over for my DC!
Pretty sure this is not true. New NCAA rules prevent any commitments prior to HS junior year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hearing of several students already in at their chosen schools (athletic recruits, obvi.) Great news for them. Can't wait until this process is over for my DC!
Pretty sure this is not true. New NCAA rules prevent any commitments prior to HS junior year.
Anonymous wrote:Hearing of several students already in at their chosen schools (athletic recruits, obvi.) Great news for them. Can't wait until this process is over for my DC!