Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Required? Who requires it?
Have you seen the HR people responding here over the years? They consider it a ‘red flag’ to not have a LI profile.
+1 I've never heard of this being a requirement.Anonymous wrote:Required? Who requires it?
Anonymous wrote:I have a LI profile but it's out of date. I do find it obnoxious that some people consider it required. It reflects laziness by HR people -- they think if they can find an LI profile, they've adequately vetted a candidate. But it's really easy to create a nice, shiny LI profile while lying and covering up skeletons. It's not like LI verifies anything.
Anonymous wrote:Required? Who requires it?
Anonymous wrote:You have our resumes, what other info do you need? Why is LI ‘required’ by so many HR people, and why is it a ‘red flag’ if you don’t have a profile? LI is now extraordinarily invasive. There is too much info that needs to be put out there that makes it easy for scammers to steal your identity or try to phish/social engineer you or your bank. It’s also crazy how many permissions LI now asks for. Can we get rid of this platform already? It’s probably worse than Facebook and ruins everyone’s privacy.
Anonymous wrote:You have our resumes, what other info do you need? Why is LI ‘required’ by so many HR people, and why is it a ‘red flag’ if you don’t have a profile? LI is now extraordinarily invasive. There is too much info that needs to be put out there that makes it easy for scammers to steal your identity or try to phish/social engineer you or your bank. It’s also crazy how many permissions LI now asks for. Can we get rid of this platform already? It’s probably worse than Facebook and ruins everyone’s privacy.