Anonymous wrote:Honestly it’s a business transaction, you need to take emotion and feelings about it out of it. I think the approach is silly but if you like the house ignore the suggested terms of the “final offer” and make whatever offer you’re comfortable with. It may look good to them if they have no other offers that meet their terms. You don’t have to like the sellers, they won’t be living there anymore if you get the house. They are probably trusting their agent who isn’t making the best decision for them. I’d make the offer, lower than asking if that’s what you want to do, and with whatever contingencies you want.
Anonymous wrote:Yes. I'm out!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I saw a house I like on the Final Offer. The Final Offer terms have a minimum that is above the asking price and specifically rule out contingencies. I gave up on making an offer.
Final Offer makes you less likely to make offers that will go nowhere and simply waste both parties time.
Anonymous wrote:Agent X here.
I've seen a few agents use this. It's supposed to have "more transparency" in the process. I don't understand what the upside would be to using this. It's just a way for a seller to say that they want more than list price like you found with the home you liked, and no contingencies. To me all that is just like a suggested retail price. Sure we WANT $4M and no contingencies so we'll put that on Final Offer, but we know the house is only worth $240,000 and the roof is clearly falling in. But maybe people won't notice, honey!
Anonymous wrote:I saw a house I like on the Final Offer. The Final Offer terms have a minimum that is above the asking price and specifically rule out contingencies. I gave up on making an offer.