Anonymous
08/13/2023 12:28
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh Lordy, there are text messages
Who leaked ahead of time?
The defense. The leaks are always from Trump.
But they seem to be damaging to his own side, so?
Anonymous
08/13/2023 12:25
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:We all heard the recording. I can’t see what the idiot’s defense is.
Of course we all heard the recording. Do the Rethuglicans think we're all stupid and deaf?! "I just want to find 11,780 votes" will live on in my memory forever. He was badgering Raffensperger for an hour!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-raffensperger-call-georgia-vote/2021/01/03/d45acb92-4dc4-11eb-bda4-615aaefd0555_story.html
Anonymous
08/13/2023 12:05
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh Lordy, there are text messages
Who leaked ahead of time?
The defense. The leaks are always from Trump.
Trump’s defense team wouldn’t have them yet, unless a co-conspirator forwarded them.
Anonymous
08/13/2023 11:35
Subject: GA Case
Mandatory minimum sentencing. The Governor can not pardon.
Anonymous
08/13/2023 11:16
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh Lordy, there are text messages
Who leaked ahead of time?
The defense. The leaks are always from Trump.
Anonymous
08/13/2023 10:03
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Oh Lordy, there are text messages
Who leaked ahead of time?
Anonymous
08/13/2023 09:13
Subject: GA Case
Oh Lordy, there are text messages
Anonymous
08/12/2023 22:20
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We all heard the recording. I can’t see what the idiot’s defense is.
That is my point (OP).
What took years?
Jack Smith’s case seems more complex, and he has already filed charges.
It wasn't *just* Trump making the call...the whole fake elector scheme had emails and others involved (hence a conspiracy) - so it IS a lot more complicated than just the one phone call.
Anonymous
08/12/2023 22:17
Subject: GA Case
1. They may feel the audio can be spun by the defense. Trump side has already suggested it.
2. It would be negligent to leave the investigation incomplete. Especially for something of this magnitude.
GA needs to get to the right outcome, not the quick outcome. Frustrating as that might be to us.
2. It would be negligent to leave the investigation incomplete. Especially for something of this magnitude.
GA needs to get to the right outcome, not the quick outcome. Frustrating as that might be to us.
Anonymous
08/12/2023 22:07
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:We all heard the recording. I can’t see what the idiot’s defense is.
That is my point (OP).
What took years?
Jack Smith’s case seems more complex, and he has already filed charges.
Anonymous
08/12/2023 19:23
Subject: GA Case
We all heard the recording. I can’t see what the idiot’s defense is.
Anonymous
08/12/2023 18:55
Subject: GA Case
"they" isn't "she"
She is doing her job.
They are the media who are being spoon fed from the Trump camp.
She is doing her job.
They are the media who are being spoon fed from the Trump camp.
Anonymous
08/12/2023 16:33
Subject: GA Case
Tuesday.
Anonymous
08/12/2023 16:05
Subject: Re:GA Case
It’s going to the grand jury early next week. So we’ll have to see what they decide.
Anonymous
08/12/2023 15:01
Subject: GA Case
Why is she dragging this out. They keep teasing that indictment is imminent. The case seems straightforward. Am I wrong?