Anonymous wrote:Achieving in at least one field at the level of a successful elite 23-year old in that field. For example, doing and publishing original cutting-edge research, publishing a front-page social justice series in a local or national newspaper, composing and conducting their own musical, leading an important political movement, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:it's about which pair of AO with 3 and 22 months experience respectively reads the app.
Don't you think that admissions officers are given directions to look for certain qualities ?
. Not true. Harvard gets about 60k, Yale about 50k and Princeton about 40k applications.Anonymous wrote:Outside of that, extracurriculars and other life experiences. Even then, it's a crapshoot. Each of them get over 50K applications a year, so it's largely a numbers game.
Anonymous wrote:I think this is interesting. Once you remove the obvious (classes, grades and test scores), most people don’t know what makes a good HPY candidate. Got one vote up thread for leadership. It’s particularly interesting because those on DCUM with kids rejected from Ivies are sure there’s discrimination or a lottery effect going on, but I don’t know how such conclusions can be made if people don’t even know what makes an effective candidate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:it's about which pair of AO with 3 and 22 months experience respectively reads the app.
Don't you think that admissions officers are given directions to look for certain qualities ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:it's about which pair of AO with 3 and 22 months experience respectively reads the app.
Don't you think that admissions officers are given directions to look for certain qualities ?
Anonymous wrote:it's about which pair of AO with 3 and 22 months experience respectively reads the app.