Anonymous wrote:In a nutshell LIV at a center means every student was formally found eligible by the committee. A student never loses that designation (you don’t reapply or ever get “kicked out”). By the rules, no other students are in this classes and they follow the official AAP curriculum and pacing.
A LLIV, by definition not at a center, is pretty much unregulated and run how the principal wants. This includes what students make up the class (which can change any time) as well as that they don’t have to follow the LIV curriculum or pacing. Some might still follow it, but not all do nor do they have to. The cluster model some schools use just has a small group of AAP students in an otherwise gen ed class, and therefore is unlikely to follow full AAP curriculum and pacing.
There are pros and cons to the tradeoffs between the two, the details of which depend on which center school and which base/local level iv. If at a great local school you may jot care about the center. You have to trust the principal a lot at a local since they can do pretty much whatever they want.
Anonymous wrote:Look at how many AAP students stay at the local level school and how many actually go to the AAP center school. My kids went to Chesterbrook and most AAP identified students stayed. Its local level program was larger than a few of the smaller AAP center schools elsewhere in the county. I would call it a robust program. Based on conversations with others, it seems that Spring Hill is similar. If you are specific about which school you are considering, I am sure posters will be able to help you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A concern is peer group. While I don't want DC in a school that is hyper-focused on competition and achievement-based social comparison, I also don't really want an environment where many parents aren't too interested in their kids' academic success. Maybe I'm wrong but if it's a higher SES school and there's not much level 2/3 participation, that seems a bit worrisome to me.
You do whatever you want with your kid. Why would you care what other kids is doing or not doing? It's impossible to find a "peer group" just fit your "want" perfectly. Welcome to real world.
NP. Peer group is important. A good peer group keeps a kid on the right path, a bad peer group can derail a kid. Sometimes it's not obvious which is which, and oftentimes a parent cannot control it. But choosing a school is something that a parent can do and be thoughtful about -- and something every parent on this forum is thoughtful about.
My children were not in Level IV AAP, but still were in the accelerated math class at our ES.Anonymous wrote:The most important difference is that kids in AAP are accelerated one year for math starting in third grade. Even at a high SES school, the kids in Gen Ed stay on grade level for math. The high SES school may say they will do pull-outs for gen ed kids for math if they need more challenge, but those kids won’t accelerate a year.
Acceleration is important if you want your kid to take AP calculus HS.
Anonymous wrote:I will add that based on how they do AAP now, it is harder to get into AAP at the higher SES schools because there are so many well prepared smart students and they don’t need a separate program to support them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A concern is peer group. While I don't want DC in a school that is hyper-focused on competition and achievement-based social comparison, I also don't really want an environment where many parents aren't too interested in their kids' academic success. Maybe I'm wrong but if it's a higher SES school and there's not much level 2/3 participation, that seems a bit worrisome to me.
You do whatever you want with your kid. Why would you care what other kids is doing or not doing? It's impossible to find a "peer group" just fit your "want" perfectly. Welcome to real world.
Anonymous wrote:A concern is peer group. While I don't want DC in a school that is hyper-focused on competition and achievement-based social comparison, I also don't really want an environment where many parents aren't too interested in their kids' academic success. Maybe I'm wrong but if it's a higher SES school and there's not much level 2/3 participation, that seems a bit worrisome to me.