I love WFH more than anyone, but there’s no question that RTO is much better for the local economy. Lunches, metro rides, parking fees, dry cleaners, etc.
It's a bad move. I'm a DOJ attorney, and constantly evaluating my private sector options. If WFH is reduced, I'll go with the money, understanding that I am being paid more and going in at least as often.
And the DOJ will replace you in a heartbeat. Bye!
Anonymous wrote:I love WFH more than anyone, but there’s no question that RTO is much better for the local economy. Lunches, metro rides, parking fees, dry cleaners, etc.
Anonymous wrote:What is the motivation? To increase productivity or just because so many office buildings are empty?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a bad move. I'm a DOJ attorney, and constantly evaluating my private sector options. If WFH is reduced, I'll go with the money, understanding that I am being paid more and going in at least as often.
And the DOJ will replace you in a heartbeat. Bye!
Anonymous wrote:It's a bad move. I'm a DOJ attorney, and constantly evaluating my private sector options. If WFH is reduced, I'll go with the money, understanding that I am being paid more and going in at least as often.
Anonymous wrote:Axios has an article about how Biden wants federal agencies to now actively require in person work.
The SEC won’t be impacted by this right since we have a 3 year union agreement to only go in 2x per PP?
Anonymous wrote:What is the motivation? To increase productivity or just because so many office buildings are empty?