Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The 2003 Haunted Mansion film was the lowest performing Disney adaptation film in Disney history. This 2023 version performed just as poorly at the box office coming in as 2nd worst.
The marketing for this film was insane. Billboards everywhere, commercials, etc. Looked totally boring. Considered taking my son to it tonight anyway bc he was begging to go to the theater, but it was PG13.
Anonymous wrote:The 2003 Haunted Mansion film was the lowest performing Disney adaptation film in Disney history. This 2023 version performed just as poorly at the box office coming in as 2nd worst.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had no idea this is how copyrights are extended. Can’t one just apply for an extension as opposed to funding an entire movie?
That was my thought too. Sane with (invention ) patents.
Anonymous wrote:I had no idea this is how copyrights are extended. Can’t one just apply for an extension as opposed to funding an entire movie?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Given that it was last made 20 years ago maybe they needed to remake it to continue copy right claims.
Wouldn't Disney still own the copyright, since it's based on the ride at Magic Kingdom?
I thought it was a cute movie, if you've been to the ride and you know the back story of the Haunted Mansion.
I'm actually thinking about going to see the new version of the movie. I'm more excited for that than Barbieheimer.
Anonymous wrote:Given that it was last made 20 years ago maybe they needed to remake it to continue copy right claims.