Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If Dems really wanted too, they could make a full 8-0 sweep for Democrats, too bad the state courts struck it down.
Why exactly is that "too bad"? You are telling on yourself.
We should probably have 2 GOP congresspeople to represent their red districts. D1 for sure, and probably one more district.
Democrats need to gerrymander to counteract GOP gerrymanders. Its better when we do it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If Dems really wanted too, they could make a full 8-0 sweep for Democrats, too bad the state courts struck it down.
Why exactly is that "too bad"? You are telling on yourself.
We should probably have 2 GOP congresspeople to represent their red districts. D1 for sure, and probably one more district.
Anonymous wrote:If Dems really wanted too, they could make a full 8-0 sweep for Democrats, too bad the state courts struck it down.
Anonymous wrote:Maryland is incredibly gerrymandered. MD could easily have a 5-3 map if they stopped gerrymandering
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is the only district in MD that will be competitive, you can thank D's for that. Gerrymandering sucks.
Maryland isn't gerrymandered
Anonymous wrote:This is the only district in MD that will be competitive, you can thank D's for that. Gerrymandering sucks.
Anonymous wrote:Not unless they get rid of Northern MoCo