Anonymous wrote:As colleges revamp their policies, they really need to reconsider early decision. It can be a huge bump, and yet kids who need the flexibility to compare financial offers can't take advantage of it.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Well duh. The 0.1% are probably either highly connected or donors (or both).
Anonymous wrote:“A large new study, released Monday, shows that it has not been because these children had more impressive grades on average or took harder classes. They tended to have higher SAT scores and finely honed résumés, and applied at a higher rate — but they were overrepresented even after accounting for those things.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“The new data shows that among students with the same test scores, the colleges gave preference to the children of alumni and to recruited athletes, and gave children from private schools higher nonacademic ratings. The result is the clearest picture yet of how America’s elite colleges perpetuate the intergenerational transfer of wealth and opportunity.”
cool.But what are the "elite" colleges? Are we talking about the Ivies only, or those in the top 25 USNWR? or what?
Anonymous wrote:“The new data shows that among students with the same test scores, the colleges gave preference to the children of alumni and to recruited athletes, and gave children from private schools higher nonacademic ratings. The result is the clearest picture yet of how America’s elite colleges perpetuate the intergenerational transfer of wealth and opportunity.”
Anonymous wrote:What is the 60-99th percentile? I don't have a NY Times subscription so I can't read that article.
Anonymous wrote:There is an interesting article by the New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/07/24/upshot/ivy-league-elite-college-admissions.html
Look at the graph. Small preference for the poor, large preference for the 0.1%. At the cost of the 60th to 99th percentile.
that's you DCUM.