Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm seeing that the definition of "hook" might vary.
-Top grades
-Top scores
-Awards
-Leadership
-Volunteer
-Strong eval teachers / alum
-URM / UR rural area
Only the last is a hook.
Anonymous wrote:I'm seeing that the definition of "hook" might vary.
-Top grades
-Top scores
-Awards
-Leadership
-Volunteer
-Strong eval teachers / alum
-URM / UR rural area
Anonymous wrote:People keep saying that TO made admission much harder. If that's the case for some students, it must be much easier for other students. Colleges still need to fill the same amount of spots. It's always hard to get in the top ones, but it's questionable now is much harder than before.
Anonymous wrote:For colleges that reject 9 out of 10 applicants and admit 30%+ ALDCs, what do you think?
Anonymous wrote:My dd got into HYP in 2020 with no hooks (yes, I know, pre-TO). We are in New England and admissions pretty much as tough here as anywhere. Directly and indirectly I have known a number of kids over the years who got in to the most competitive schools without being URM/first gen or athletes, I don't know about their legacy status. But what these kids all had in common was they really dug in to their own education and actively sought out opportunities to grow and contribute, they were all kids excited about learning and whatever their activities were it showed in the application I imagine. That's not a guarantee for a spot at a reachy-reach school, plenty of equally awesome kids with nearly identical apps probably didn't get in. But it's certainly possible.