Anonymous wrote:Thank you again! I hadn’t thought about the Calo bill being split into educational and therapeutic, it makes sense that the cost can pile up very high very quick, I see it now. On RICA, you’re giving me more and more comfort - I appreciate the inside view. Agree on Foundation, I have not looked into it in detail but I’ve read about reactions similar to yours, it’s not a place for a child to end up in, it seems. Hadn’t looked into Lauren Hill but it’s far for me too. Katherine Thomas would be amazing but my educational advocate told me they won’t touch DC because of the hitting history (I don’t know why they won’t look at the child as they are now, but would have the history hang over their head - and for how long - but I guess it’s out for us. That would have been a great school if it were an option. Phillips was suggested at the CIEP meeting but CIEP said they won’t include it, not sure why - they only picked the four schools I listed. Maybe when we get back to them after we haven’t found a good fit, they will open up the Phillips option. Has anyone managed to climb back up the restrictiveness ladder? Or do kids just stay at level or go down a level if there are issues? SESES kept saying they try to mainstream kids but I’ve never actually seen anyone mainstreamed, they seem to just drift off the system or go non-public…
I visited Phillips Annandale last year when my child was in 4th. It was, IMO, a place that would cause trauma for a young child. There was a kid in a padded room where a child was screaming and throwing himself against the walls. My child has behavioral difficulties but nothing the school system can’t handle, so I was looking primarily to address severe learning disabilities, so someone else with different needs may have another perspective.