Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost every Republican in the House voted to assess a $16 million dollar fine on Adam Schiff for his part of the Russia hoax.
With this precedent in place that you can issue large fines against a member of Congress because you don't like what they said, even if it didn't get a majority vote and technically they voted to send it to a committee to investigate, how might Democrats use this when they have control of the House?
It wasn't that they "didn't like what he said" - he LIED. He misled the public.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost every Republican in the House voted to assess a $16 million dollar fine on Adam Schiff for his part of the Russia hoax.
With this precedent in place that you can issue large fines against a member of Congress because you don't like what they said, even if it didn't get a majority vote and technically they voted to send it to a committee to investigate, how might Democrats use this when they have control of the House?
It wasn't that they "didn't like what he said" - he LIED. He misled the public.![]()

Anonymous wrote:Almost every Republican in the House voted to assess a $16 million dollar fine on Adam Schiff for his part of the Russia hoax.
With this precedent in place that you can issue large fines against a member of Congress because you don't like what they said, even if it didn't get a majority vote and technically they voted to send it to a committee to investigate, how might Democrats use this when they have control of the House?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost every Republican in the House voted to assess a $16 million dollar fine on Adam Schiff for his part of the Russia hoax.
With this precedent in place that you can issue large fines against a member of Congress because you don't like what they said, even if it didn't get a majority vote and technically they voted to send it to a committee to investigate, how might Democrats use this when they have control of the House?
It wasn't that they "didn't like what he said" - he LIED. He misled the public.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost every Republican in the House voted to assess a $16 million dollar fine on Adam Schiff for his part of the Russia hoax.
With this precedent in place that you can issue large fines against a member of Congress because you don't like what they said, even if it didn't get a majority vote and technically they voted to send it to a committee to investigate, how might Democrats use this when they have control of the House?
It wasn't that they "didn't like what he said" - he LIED. He misled the public.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Almost every Republican in the House voted to assess a $16 million dollar fine on Adam Schiff for his part of the Russia hoax.
With this precedent in place that you can issue large fines against a member of Congress because you don't like what they said, even if it didn't get a majority vote and technically they voted to send it to a committee to investigate, how might Democrats use this when they have control of the House?
Anonymous wrote:They should have just stuck to a censure. His comments over the past few years have deserved a censure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They should have just stuck to a censure. His comments over the past few years have deserved a censure.
If you think HIS comments deserve a censure, how do you feel about MTG, Boobert, and all the other Rep crazies?
Anonymous wrote:They should have just stuck to a censure. His comments over the past few years have deserved a censure.
Anonymous wrote:Almost every Republican in the House voted to assess a $16 million dollar fine on Adam Schiff for his part of the Russia hoax.
With this precedent in place that you can issue large fines against a member of Congress because you don't like what they said, even if it didn't get a majority vote and technically they voted to send it to a committee to investigate, how might Democrats use this when they have control of the House?