Anonymous wrote:I would think chances are better at public.
Smaller grade size in private, lots of rich kids with tutors and connections. If your kid is not at the top he’s still being compared against his class and there’s tough competition.
Public has a lot of smart kids but at least connections and legacies tend to be less and there are always lower performing kids.
If you’re a middle class family with an average kid, without money for an army of tutors, no connections, and no hooks-private does your kid no favors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can do the math on admissions data. It’s not perfect but pretty insightful. I compared our (very good) public and a big3, and big3 was much better. Publics give admission—not matriculation—but even giving the public all the benefit of the doubt, the private was materially better at placement. Can’t speak to nonbig3
And, as others will beat you down on, it ultimately didn’t come down to admission data for us but rather the happiness and stoking curiosity for our child.
Ugh...what measure are you using for this. You can't use %age of a graduating class or anything like that...you have to just look at the nominal number of kids from say Whitman going to Top 50 vs. say Bullis. Again, OP said they are not going to a Big3 (looking at Bullis, Landon), so it's not relevant.
Also, OP specifically asked about schools 21-50...on this measure, I don't think you will see any real statistical difference. All this assumes, that you would be fine if your kid goes to Ohio State (#50) vs. say UCLA/Emory (#20).
I would welcome your analysis, but it appears to me that you are offering an opinion.
And the PP clearly said Big3; did you think OP could not read?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can do the math on admissions data. It’s not perfect but pretty insightful. I compared our (very good) public and a big3, and big3 was much better. Publics give admission—not matriculation—but even giving the public all the benefit of the doubt, the private was materially better at placement. Can’t speak to nonbig3
And, as others will beat you down on, it ultimately didn’t come down to admission data for us but rather the happiness and stoking curiosity for our child.
Ugh...what measure are you using for this. You can't use %age of a graduating class or anything like that...you have to just look at the nominal number of kids from say Whitman going to Top 50 vs. say Bullis. Again, OP said they are not going to a Big3 (looking at Bullis, Landon), so it's not relevant.
Also, OP specifically asked about schools 21-50...on this measure, I don't think you will see any real statistical difference. All this assumes, that you would be fine if your kid goes to Ohio State (#50) vs. say UCLA/Emory (#20).
Anonymous wrote:You can do the math on admissions data. It’s not perfect but pretty insightful. I compared our (very good) public and a big3, and big3 was much better. Publics give admission—not matriculation—but even giving the public all the benefit of the doubt, the private was materially better at placement. Can’t speak to nonbig3
And, as others will beat you down on, it ultimately didn’t come down to admission data for us but rather the happiness and stoking curiosity for our child.
Anonymous wrote:You can do the math on admissions data. It’s not perfect but pretty insightful. I compared our (very good) public and a big3, and big3 was much better. Publics give admission—not matriculation—but even giving the public all the benefit of the doubt, the private was materially better at placement. Can’t speak to nonbig3
And, as others will beat you down on, it ultimately didn’t come down to admission data for us but rather the happiness and stoking curiosity for our child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can do the math on admissions data. It’s not perfect but pretty insightful. I compared our (very good) public and a big3, and big3 was much better. Publics give admission—not matriculation—but even giving the public all the benefit of the doubt, the private was materially better at placement. Can’t speak to nonbig3
And, as others will beat you down on, it ultimately didn’t come down to admission data for us but rather the happiness and stoking curiosity for our child.
Ugh...what measure are you using for this. You can't use %age of a graduating class or anything like that...you have to just look at the nominal number of kids from say Whitman going to Top 50 vs. say Bullis. Again, OP said they are not going to a Big3 (looking at Bullis, Landon), so it's not relevant.
Also, OP specifically asked about schools 21-50...on this measure, I don't think you will see any real statistical difference. All this assumes, that you would be fine if your kid goes to Ohio State (#50) vs. say UCLA/Emory (#20).
Anonymous wrote:You can do the math on admissions data. It’s not perfect but pretty insightful. I compared our (very good) public and a big3, and big3 was much better. Publics give admission—not matriculation—but even giving the public all the benefit of the doubt, the private was materially better at placement. Can’t speak to nonbig3
And, as others will beat you down on, it ultimately didn’t come down to admission data for us but rather the happiness and stoking curiosity for our child.
Anonymous wrote:DS will probably play 3 sports in high school, doubtful he will be a college recruit but is very athletic. DH and I both attended ivy and T20 colleges and grad schools. We are not big donors so not sure how much legacy will matter.