Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All this tells me is that your definition of "celebrities" must be very narrow. Do you include all the top people in their respective field? Or you do think only of actors and musicians? There are MANY celebrities in this area. Just more in business and STEM fields. There are many celebrities in Silicon Valley - but in high tech. See how that works?
Lmao, nobody cares about some Sillicon Valley hack. Celebrity = someone the average person has heard of. It does not include exploitative CEOs.
DC people truly don’t have a clue.
I have a hard time relating to people like you. You think that a top scientist, admired by his or her peers, and who has dedicated their life to figuring out cancer or diabetes, is somehow less worthy of your admiration that an actress? You believe that all CEOs are exploitative, but do YOU spend your time reducing your carbon footprint and giving to the less fortunate? You believe that inventors who work on biomechanical devices, or software engineers who create AI platforms that will ease your life, are unintelligent and should not be considered stars in their own fields?
You are very silly, PP. Art and culture do not exist in a vacuum, separate from the industrial and technological context of their day. The former is entirely dependent on the latter.
Be a little mindful next time you decide to scoff at the things that actually matter in life.