Anonymous wrote:I think they should’ve just moved it to age and kept it simple.
Anonymous wrote:Not sure how this will work for kids with late May birthdays who for developmental reasons -- not trying to game the system in sports -- were put into pre-K/junior K programs ages ago and now have to play up.
The rule is what it is but if a kid is graduating in 2031 and now has to play with the 2030s, what happens in high school? They play back down with their club team for tournaments and outside of the Spring? The graduation year is what it is (in this case 2031) and presumably the purpose and effect of this is not to deny these kids a year of tournaments and such with a club team their senior year when the 2030 team is off in college. It may seem great now in concept, but when these kids have been playing a year up from their graduation year and then show up to play with their club teams in high school (with the benefit of having played up a year), they will be competing for the same slots they once had on their younger teams.
I get the point of the rule, but there is a group of kids here that were never redshirted or held back for athletic reasons that will be impacted.
Anonymous wrote:If the standard is to be 5 when you start K (usually by a September cut off), it can't be that large of a group of kids separated from their grade by a sports cut off June 1, which is already at least three months earlier than the grade cut off. How many kids are older than 5 years and 3 months and don't start K that year?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good. About time. Also the correct way to do it. HS can have holdbacks but at the youth level you have to play with your peers. The 15 month window seems like a good compromise to allow for the summer birthdays where parents hold back kids from entering kindergartner before they are ready. For example, my youngest is a summer birthday. He went into kindergarten with his peers but we probably should have held him back for a year - he was academically ready but socially wasn't quite there. So i can see parents dealing with those situations. This also prevents the kid whose a September birthday and already the oldest kid in the class from being held back a year and could essentially be 2 years older than other kids.
I agree as long as there is an established rule and all follow consistently it will be fair. Rec lacrosse has always had a two year window
My middle son played in a tournament last fall, where there was age verification. Needed to provide a headshot and birth certificate that was uploaded and sent to the organization. I am sure some programs will cheat but this at least places some parameters to catch them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good. About time. Also the correct way to do it. HS can have holdbacks but at the youth level you have to play with your peers. The 15 month window seems like a good compromise to allow for the summer birthdays where parents hold back kids from entering kindergartner before they are ready. For example, my youngest is a summer birthday. He went into kindergarten with his peers but we probably should have held him back for a year - he was academically ready but socially wasn't quite there. So i can see parents dealing with those situations. This also prevents the kid whose a September birthday and already the oldest kid in the class from being held back a year and could essentially be 2 years older than other kids.
I agree as long as there is an established rule and all follow consistently it will be fair. Rec lacrosse has always had a two year window
Anonymous wrote:So you can still be a year older, just not 2 years older?
Anonymous wrote:Good. About time. Also the correct way to do it. HS can have holdbacks but at the youth level you have to play with your peers. The 15 month window seems like a good compromise to allow for the summer birthdays where parents hold back kids from entering kindergartner before they are ready. For example, my youngest is a summer birthday. He went into kindergarten with his peers but we probably should have held him back for a year - he was academically ready but socially wasn't quite there. So i can see parents dealing with those situations. This also prevents the kid whose a September birthday and already the oldest kid in the class from being held back a year and could essentially be 2 years older than other kids.