Anonymous wrote:I need a better profession. Teachers make a lot more than I do. Maybe they should open it up more. I actually know a lot of people that want to get into the field, but they don't want to do all the training that goes along with it. They all want to be subs or assistants.
Anonymous wrote:I teach HS science and saw about 90 students today. I asked how many wanted to be a teacher and not a single hand went up. I asked them why not and they just started laughing because they know what the job requires, but they continue to joke around and hold side conversations, play on phones, watch cartoons on laptops they are "using to see the notes better", etc. I had multiple students write passes to the bathroom today only to be gone for 20 minutes, out of a 90 min period. I don't have time to write emails to parents about behavior that, despite parents speaking with their students, does not change. I actually had a student today take a phone back off of my desk after I confiscated it while my back was turned. I'm one of the teachers kids say they really want to get for my subject. I still get incredible levels of disrespect every day.
Anonymous wrote:Fcps does not have any teacher parent conferences anymore. They are all by request only. Another fcps fail
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
4. State Testing- just get rid of it already. It takes away from the students learning and puts pressure on teachers to only teach towards the test (this is what happens when you tie teacher raises and school funding to test scores). Let’s be honest- rich people care about it because the high test scores affect their property value. We don’t need to be making decisions about public education to benefit some rich people and their property values
What a thoughtful post. I agree with your concern, but would like to highlight one contradiction here:
State testing (SOL and VGA) are, for better or worse, the only place where students get at least some feedback that allows them and their parents to see how well they do with respect to their peers. This is because SOL results are publicly posted on the VDoE website and are uniformly administered throughout the state. This is unlike all other school assignments where the score, in addition to being provided without comments, is also opaque to the point of being meaningless.
I would actually like to see a system where students receive their SOL score as a letter grade, thus providing incentive for students to do well and not just for teachers that their students do well. Teaching to the test, btw, is not a bad thing as long as the test is good (the SOLs are perhaps a bit too watered down, given their express purpose of just testing the very basics). But let's have students master these basics first, as evidenced by tests, then teachers can stack all the other nice things they want to teach on top.
As a side note, standardized tests will also help members of underrepresented groups proportionally more, thus contributing to the political goals of some.
I don't know about their express purpose of just testing the very basics but the SOLs are not watered down and do not test just the very basics. They are tests of the standards - doing well means that the student has learned everything they are are supposed to have learned. The SOLs are not easy, basic tests. They also go in several-year cycles, for some years parents complain that they are too easy so they are raised up, then parents complain that they are too hard so they are lowered down a bit. In 2019, we were in a harder phase where the tests had just been made harder.
Anonymous wrote:Part of the problem is that teaching is not a respected job in NOVA, even by many teachers. How could it be when teachers have access to so many other high-paying jobs? Why would you be a teacher when you could work for X, lower your stress, earn more money, and double your prestige?
Plus, there isn't the sense of community in NOVA like there is in other places. Families are always coming and going, moving in and out, there is less permanency to the whole thing. Schooling can feel very disconnected as a whole.
Where we live now, there are three parent-teacher conferences for K-12 during the school year. Three, not only one like in FCPS. If your child is failing, you receive a print out up to the minute of your child's grades on all assignments, well before the quarter ends. There is a sense of community, and the teachers work with the parents, there is a "it takes a village" mentality around education that I never felt in NOVA and we were there for more than ten years in that system.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
4. State Testing- just get rid of it already. It takes away from the students learning and puts pressure on teachers to only teach towards the test (this is what happens when you tie teacher raises and school funding to test scores). Let’s be honest- rich people care about it because the high test scores affect their property value. We don’t need to be making decisions about public education to benefit some rich people and their property values
What a thoughtful post. I agree with your concern, but would like to highlight one contradiction here:
State testing (SOL and VGA) are, for better or worse, the only place where students get at least some feedback that allows them and their parents to see how well they do with respect to their peers. This is because SOL results are publicly posted on the VDoE website and are uniformly administered throughout the state. This is unlike all other school assignments where the score, in addition to being provided without comments, is also opaque to the point of being meaningless.
I would actually like to see a system where students receive their SOL score as a letter grade, thus providing incentive for students to do well and not just for teachers that their students do well. Teaching to the test, btw, is not a bad thing as long as the test is good (the SOLs are perhaps a bit too watered down, given their express purpose of just testing the very basics). But let's have students master these basics first, as evidenced by tests, then teachers can stack all the other nice things they want to teach on top.
As a side note, standardized tests will also help members of underrepresented groups proportionally more, thus contributing to the political goals of some.
Anonymous wrote:
4. State Testing- just get rid of it already. It takes away from the students learning and puts pressure on teachers to only teach towards the test (this is what happens when you tie teacher raises and school funding to test scores). Let’s be honest- rich people care about it because the high test scores affect their property value. We don’t need to be making decisions about public education to benefit some rich people and their property values