Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't get a forerunner unless you are REALLY into stats. They are too expensive for the 12:40 pace, I'm assuming you are newer or a casual runner. I have a Garmin Venu but have had a Fitbit. I switched because the Fitbit maps were soooo wonky. Look at the run on the app - is it all over the place? Do you think the time or the distance is wrong? I will check the distance again on Google maps. None of them are perfect but you are really off by some metric. Also, did you start the watch when the buzzer started or when you ran by the chip marker? I usually am towards the middle of the race line and it takes 30 seconds at least before I can even start running. I start it when I pass the chip marker.
Fitbits break very easily. I've had a Garmin Fenix for six years and still runs like the first day i bought it.
I'm not sure if either are very accurate. Just don't go up to the 10k organizer and tell them that you didn't run the full length. The watches aren't as accurate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't get a forerunner unless you are REALLY into stats. They are too expensive for the 12:40 pace, I'm assuming you are newer or a casual runner. I have a Garmin Venu but have had a Fitbit. I switched because the Fitbit maps were soooo wonky. Look at the run on the app - is it all over the place? Do you think the time or the distance is wrong? I will check the distance again on Google maps. None of them are perfect but you are really off by some metric. Also, did you start the watch when the buzzer started or when you ran by the chip marker? I usually am towards the middle of the race line and it takes 30 seconds at least before I can even start running. I start it when I pass the chip marker.
Fitbits break very easily. I've had a Garmin Fenix for six years and still runs like the first day i bought it.
I'm not sure if either are very accurate. Just don't go up to the 10k organizer and tell them that you didn't run the full length. The watches aren't as accurate.
Anonymous wrote:People sell used garmin watches on eBay all the time. I rarely look at all the crazy data on garmin connect and I am a pretty strong runner (like sub 20 5K). I got a 945 lte two years ago and now do triathlon. You never know what you are capable of until you try!
Anonymous wrote:Don't get a forerunner unless you are REALLY into stats. They are too expensive for the 12:40 pace, I'm assuming you are newer or a casual runner. I have a Garmin Venu but have had a Fitbit. I switched because the Fitbit maps were soooo wonky. Look at the run on the app - is it all over the place? Do you think the time or the distance is wrong? I will check the distance again on Google maps. None of them are perfect but you are really off by some metric. Also, did you start the watch when the buzzer started or when you ran by the chip marker? I usually am towards the middle of the race line and it takes 30 seconds at least before I can even start running. I start it when I pass the chip marker.
Anonymous wrote:I ran a 10K yesterday. My Fitbit watch reported that my run was at a 12:40 pace. However, the chip time was 13:27, so almost like a full minute slower. It was the first time I had a "check" on my watch accuracy. My goal was to come in sub 13:00. Is this kind of difference typical for watches?